Australians complacent on economy, analysts warn
|
Economists and analysts at Bank of America/Merrill Lynch have warned that Australians have become too complacent about “potential poor economic conditions”. The warnings have come in the past two days of client notes, with economists warning yesterday of the impact of the sizeable downturn in demand for our strongly performing export sector in the months ahead. “We don’t want to overstate the case for Australian economic weakness for the remainder of this year but we do think that there is complacency about what lies ahead,” ML economists wrote. And this morning, broking analysts warned, in a sweeping downgrade to the outlooks for some of our major retailing names, that “households and businesses are expected to find it tougher in the months ahead with both profits and wages hurt by the income effect of a delayed drop in commodity prices and investment”. The warning comes as the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development has released figures showing the worst-ever performance by the group’s 30 countries as a whole (plus the six major non economic members such as China and Brazil). Based on preliminary estimates, the 30 OECD and the six other economies saw growth contract by 2.1% in the March quarter, the biggest ever fall recorded by the OECD, following the 2.0% contraction in the December quarter. Our first quarter growth figures are out next week and estimates put our contraction around 0.3% to 0.5%. That would make it the first recession since 1991, but even so, many analysts point out that compared with our trading partners, its outperformance. This view has been supported by solid retail sales figures, building approvals and housing finance numbers for February and March, while the jobs situation refuses to worsen like it has in the US, UK and Europe. In fact since Lehman Brothers collapsed last September, Australia has seen 177,000 jobs lost, while 62,000 have been created. That’s a far more buoyant labour market than in our trading partners. Hence this feeling of complacency that Merrill Lynch has warned about yesterday and today. The economics team said yesterday:
Looking at two leading retailers, David Jones and the still rapidly growing JB Hi-Fi, ML said this morning:
Overnight there were reports from Canada (mentioned above as being a possible model for Australia) where the Government is now belatedly waking up to the slumping economy. Canada’s position has been worsened by the Eastern half’s (and most populous part) exposure to the US economy, especially the imploding car industry and Chrysler and General Motors in particular. Bloomberg reported Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty as saying the federal deficit will be “substantially” greater and the economy will shrink more than he forecast in January. He forecast growth would contract by 0.8% in the Federal budget on January 27. Now the Bank of Canada has estimated growth will shrink by 3% this year after a fall of 3.4% in the last quarter of 2008. With the Bank of Canada cutting interest rates to 0.25%, it is effectively hostage to the contracting US economy and the car industry. The central bank reckons first quarter growth could fall at an annual 7.3% when the final figures are released shortly. Merrill Lynch reckons that fate could be ahead of Australia as export prices and volumes for coal and iron ore contract sharply. Offsetting that is that much of contraction in export income will be felt offshore through the foreign owners of our resources (such as Xstrata, Anglo American, UK and other shareholders in BHP Billiton and in Rio Tinto). That could prove a crucial difference, and the absence of a heavy preponderance on exports of manufactured goods of all types, especially cars and computer equipment which have been devastated by the slump in demand and global trade since late 2008. |
|
|
|








One Comment
Lehman’s collapsed in September as Dyer says but his job counts (actually changes in the number of people employed/unemployed) are from March last year to April this year. The actual numbers for October to April were 11,500 more people employed and 126,300 more people unemployed. This means the labour force rose by just under 138,000 over the same period.
A rise in the number of people unemployed is not the same thing as jobs lost; people joining the labour force may not be able to find a job, and so will be counted as unemployed although they have not actually lost a job.