Comments on: Group sex: not that there’s anything wrong with that http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/15/group-s-x-not-that-there%e2%80%99s-anything-wrong-with-that/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:52:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: captain jono http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/15/group-s-x-not-that-there%e2%80%99s-anything-wrong-with-that/#comment-26688 captain jono Fri, 15 May 2009 13:35:24 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=58669#comment-26688 Did the author of this article imply they watch a lot of the nrl footy show. If so, that's not the best admission when the article is 'supposedly' critically analysing others. Well, at least you're being honest. Did the author of this article imply they watch a lot of the nrl footy show. If so, that’s not the best admission when the article is ‘supposedly’ critically analysing others.

Well, at least you’re being honest.

]]> By: John Ryan http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/15/group-s-x-not-that-there%e2%80%99s-anything-wrong-with-that/#comment-26658 John Ryan Fri, 15 May 2009 05:55:28 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=58669#comment-26658 O FFS power imbalance ect ect bollocks,sorry but I cant believe some of the BS thats being thrown about over this,all because a bunch of the Feminist Collective wanted to do a hatchet job on the NRL. Some people must live under mushrooms in parts of OZ O FFS power imbalance ect ect bollocks,sorry but I cant believe some of the BS thats being thrown about over this,all because a bunch of the Feminist Collective wanted to do a hatchet job on the NRL.
Some people must live under mushrooms in parts of OZ

]]> By: daveliberts http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/15/group-s-x-not-that-there%e2%80%99s-anything-wrong-with-that/#comment-26657 daveliberts Fri, 15 May 2009 05:36:19 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=58669#comment-26657 Interesting article. There is more to the issue than is outlined in the article though. I guess I can accept the assertions regarding group sex not necessarily being evidence of latent homosexuality, but this issue is bigger than that. There is the question of the power imbalance which existed in the room, even if the young woman was not particularly aware of it at that time. Sportsmen who understand the implications for their sport of being disrespectful to women wouldn't get into that situation. There is also the footballers involved refusing to accept that their actions may have been damaging to the young woman at the centre of the matter. While it appears nothing which will be found to have been illegal occurred, that doesn't make it right. Interesting article. There is more to the issue than is outlined in the article though. I guess I can accept the assertions regarding group sex not necessarily being evidence of latent homosexuality, but this issue is bigger than that. There is the question of the power imbalance which existed in the room, even if the young woman was not particularly aware of it at that time. Sportsmen who understand the implications for their sport of being disrespectful to women wouldn’t get into that situation. There is also the footballers involved refusing to accept that their actions may have been damaging to the young woman at the centre of the matter. While it appears nothing which will be found to have been illegal occurred, that doesn’t make it right.

]]>