<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Union greed could kill The Boston Globe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/union-greed-could-kill-the-boston-globe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/union-greed-could-kill-the-boston-globe/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/06/union-greed-could-kill-the-boston-globe/#comment-26044</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 05:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55888#comment-26044</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read some sloppy, automatic union-bashing in my time but it&#039;s difficult to fathom how you can start an article: &#039;Union greed and intransigence could kill off The Boston Globe newspaper, despite six of the seven unions with members at the struggling paper agreeing to give up concessions to keep the paper alive...&#039; what you are &#039;really&#039; saying is that ONE OUT OF SEVEN UNIONS IS greedy and intransigent. If you said &#039;...Six out of seven unions are cooperating with appallingly managed newspapers even though it costs them money and membership in a vain attempt to keep the papers afloat after the greed and intransigence of managements who refused to take advice or plan properly for the future&#039; you&#039;d be a lot more accurate. What&#039;s your problem? Year 10 level clear thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read some sloppy, automatic union-bashing in my time but it&#8217;s difficult to fathom how you can start an article: &#8216;Union greed and intransigence could kill off The Boston Globe newspaper, despite six of the seven unions with members at the struggling paper agreeing to give up concessions to keep the paper alive&#8230;&#8217; what you are &#8216;really&#8217; saying is that ONE OUT OF SEVEN UNIONS IS greedy and intransigent. If you said &#8216;&#8230;Six out of seven unions are cooperating with appallingly managed newspapers even though it costs them money and membership in a vain attempt to keep the papers afloat after the greed and intransigence of managements who refused to take advice or plan properly for the future&#8217; you&#8217;d be a lot more accurate. What&#8217;s your problem? Year 10 level clear thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/443 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 13:39:32 -->
