<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would a Springborg victory mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/what-would-a-springborg-victory-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/what-would-a-springborg-victory-mean/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John James</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/what-would-a-springborg-victory-mean/#comment-23406</link>
		<dc:creator>John James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-23406</guid>
		<description>When Rudd campaigned against Howard, the impasse over the Murray-Darling rescue, together with many of the problems and inadequacies apparent in the various State Labor administrations were attributed to Howard&#039;s alleged tactic of pursuing the &#039;blame&#039; game with the States.&lt;br /&gt;Rudd and Gillard made much of their determination to end this terrible &#039;Tory&#039; injustice and ensure that, with their new approach of respect and co-operation, Federal-State relations would enter a new era.&lt;br /&gt;Well a Springborg win will &#039;spook&#039; the horses and throw an ever more searching &#039;spotlight&#039; on Labor&#039;s inadequacies.&lt;br /&gt;Already, of course, we have seen South Australia initiate High Court action against fellow Labor colleagues in Victoria, whom Howard always contended were putting their political agenda before the national interest in relation to a Murray Darling agreement. Mike Rann just realised the same thing. This says much about Brumby, but also Gillard and Rudd and their &#039;spin&#039;&lt;br /&gt;Bur &#039;spin&#039; only gets you so far! Anna Bligh will find that out dramaticaly tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Rudd campaigned against Howard, the impasse over the Murray-Darling rescue, together with many of the problems and inadequacies apparent in the various State Labor administrations were attributed to Howard&#8217;s alleged tactic of pursuing the &#8216;blame&#8217; game with the States.<br />Rudd and Gillard made much of their determination to end this terrible &#8216;Tory&#8217; injustice and ensure that, with their new approach of respect and co-operation, Federal-State relations would enter a new era.<br />Well a Springborg win will &#8216;spook&#8217; the horses and throw an ever more searching &#8216;spotlight&#8217; on Labor&#8217;s inadequacies.<br />Already, of course, we have seen South Australia initiate High Court action against fellow Labor colleagues in Victoria, whom Howard always contended were putting their political agenda before the national interest in relation to a Murray Darling agreement. Mike Rann just realised the same thing. This says much about Brumby, but also Gillard and Rudd and their &#8216;spin&#8217;<br />Bur &#8216;spin&#8217; only gets you so far! Anna Bligh will find that out dramaticaly tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 434/444 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 10:20:22 -->
