Comments on: Police quick out of the blocks to spin their latest shooting

By: Angela May

Angela May — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

How appalling that this young kid, and that’s what he is folks, has his life ended under these circumstances. I’m sorry but I don’t buy that three or four armed police officers would be frightened of a kid with two knives no matter what the circumstances. I guess you’re going to be fatally wounded if you’re shot in the chest and the stomach as some media has reported. For god’s sake, why can’t the police aim for the shoulder or leg in these circumstances? Or better still, give them tasers. It’s a disgrace.

By: Dave Liberts

Dave Liberts — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

It seems to me (but I have heard Victorian police in the media today and may have swallowed too much of their spin) that in trying to do everything short of shoot the kid, the police left it too late to shoot to injure rather than shoot to inflict very serious (and in this case deadly) injuries. If, as some have suggested, they should have shot him in the arms and legs, then this would have needed to happen before officers felt their own safety was in peril (and I’m making a lot of assumptions here but we all have to because none of us were there). Thus they shouldn’t have held off firing at the kid as late as they did.

I was initially concerned about the introduction of taser style weapons and could not personally understand why capsicum spray would not be sufficient. This story answers my question about that issue. I would now suggest that this case will see strong consideration to tasers being introduced for Victorian cops. They are by no means perfectly safe, but a 15 year old stands a much better chance against a taser compared with a hail of bullets.

By: pamela

pamela — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

This incident takes us back to the awful Kennett years when the police shot 13 mentally ill people. Instead of calling for a negotiator or counsellor, they would demand that the person put down the weapon- butter knife in one case and when there was no instant response- shoot.
Maybe we need to explain to Victoria police yet again that when a person is psychotic, hallucinating or delusional - they are unlikely to understand much less respond to a command.They are not disobeying a lawful order but actually not comprehending it.
No doubt the coronial inquiry will be 2 or 3 years hence when only the parents, relatives and friends of this boy remember what happened.

By: Julius

Julius — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

For somebody with so many strong views Greg ii is amazing that you sometimes join heart to head and produce a sound one. It is of course quite ridiculous that police should kill someone in such circumstances. I would be hard to convince that, even if they did have to shoot they couldn’t have wounded him enough to be able to disarm him. Only a little imagination would have put a net or a coil of rope in the police car which could have been deployed against one sad individual. Haven’t they seen epics about gladiators? Alternatively a policeman, carrying a baton or similar weapon, backed by others and with a protective jacket on and headgear which would also protect his face could approach a man with a knife and keep him engaged safely enough while he was otherwise rendered harmless. Killing him is taking eugenics too far.

By: gary

gary — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

There is an implicit assumption here that somehow, these oficers wanted to shoot and that everything downstream from that is a justification. Rubbish!
There is a person on the streets, he is threatening the lives of others. Police are called in to do their unfortunate job and he threatens their lives. Drug-crazed? Mentally ill? Probably, but it doesn’t matter. In that fraction of a second that any one one person has to defend themselves against another intent on killing them, there is no time for such niceties. The only people who have a right to comment on this circumstance are those who’ve looked down the wrong end of a knife, or a gun, in the hands of a person intent on murder.
All this self-righteous, arm-chair commentary by those who’ve never been there makes me sick. If you are so sure of yourselves, then volunteer to be the one who goes unprotected and unarmed to talk down the next unknown person who takes to the streets, intent on killing the innocent.

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

‘Shoot to wound’ is a complete fallacy. It’s hard enough to hit anyone with a handgun during the confusion of a violent confrontation, which is why the point of aim is the centre of mass i.e. torso. And bullets are unpredictable - a shot to the leg or arm can kill just as easily as a shot to the chest (e.g. from bone shards severing arteries/puncturing organs).
If someone comes at me with two knives and I’ve got a gun in my hands, I’ll pull the trigger - wouldn’t you?
I’m not trying to engage with the broader implications of this incident, becuase I’m a long way from knowing all the facts. I’m just pointing out that when situations like this happen, it’s stupid to expect people not to protect themselves (and the public at large - or should the kid have been allowed to run wild?).
It may well be the case that the police failed to take actions that would have prevented the situation. Or maybe the kid was crazed and wanted to die. At this stage I don’t think anyone knows, except maybe the police involved. Hopefully we’ll find out.

By: gary

gary — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Angela May, and others of like mind, have you ever fired a weapon in self defence? Do you realize how little chance you have of accurately delivering an immobilising shot to the shoulder or leg of a moving target? I’m sorry, but you are kidding yourselves. I say again - if you know so much, get out there and face the knife.

By: bev

bev — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

The Police I know have a difficult Job where people abuse the system I feel for them, know one likes to see any one die in such circumstances, it must be difficult job to tell the parents of this event, you have to make sure it does not effect you,as a policeman.

By: Jenny Haines

Jenny Haines — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Handling these events is difficult and it is an awful result all around for everyone when an incident like this results in death in this way. No doubt the matter will be investigated by the Coroner and some of those commenting may like to wait for the Coroner’s findings before coming to any final conclusions about the events. But what this incident has done has bring to the fore the handling of acute mental health crises in our community. I have many friends who are mental health nurses who can tell of similarly awful incidents, but who in our community cares? Governments blather on about the amount they spend on mental health but there is still the need for hundreds more beds or places in acute and community based mental health support facilities. We need to stop seeing mental health crises as a law and order issue. They are health issues.

By: dermot

dermot — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

to indicate regret privately to the family and tell the press ‘wait for the coroner’. Not to leak and spin as they are doing. every policeman’s daddy is in the press saying basically what Bev is saying.

By: David

David — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

This article is bang on the money right up until the second last para:

“There are some significant questions that the police need to answer about this case. Firstly are the police trained well enough to deal calmly and compassionately with a person who is drug affected or mentally ill? Second, why is it that in a situation with four police officers against one young man the result is death to the young man?”

To the first question, it is almost impossible to deal calmly and compassionately with anyone approaching you aggressively while wielding two knives. There simply isn’t time. To the second- and it is a tricky one- the unfortunate fact is that for the wheels of this little liberal democracy of ours to turn, some actions can result in serious reprisal. If you don’t pay your taxes, you can end up in prison, or if you approach police swinging knives, there is a chance you could die. Both needless and unfortunate consequences, but sadly necessary.

Which is why this territory should have been avoided by both the police and by this article, until the coroner sorts it out. You rightly pointed out the police are guilty of trying to spin the findings before they happen, but i suggest that in this second last para you’ve done the same.

By: Dr Harvey M Tarvydas

Dr Harvey M Tarvydas — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

David are there any other coroners like the WA one. He has never served anyone nor the medical profession nor the law nor the victims anything of value ever (there are names for handsome men like that) but of course unknowingly (we Hope) he has single headedly delivered harm and damage to many in multiple ways.

By: mikey

mikey — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Such hypocritical nonsense from Barns and numerous respondents. The police indicate regret and are leaving open the result for the Coroner. What else do you expect them to do?
This is traumatic for the family of the victim, it is also traumatic for the police officers involved. Leave your kneejerk response and slander of the police force aside and wait too for the report from the Coroner.

By: Dr Harvey M Tarvydas

Dr Harvey M Tarvydas — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Your first sentence cannot be underlined enough as a description of an execution of a kid affected by capsicum spray and whatever else even mental illness or distress.

“The reaction by Victoria Police to the shooting by their officers of a 15-year-old boy in a Melbourne park last night is an appallingly insensitive exercise in self protection and spin.”

Your following paragraph about their unashamed spin describes police blurb that I listen to and I have to say listening to the spokespersons offering it up to the public they sounded INSANE.

“The Victoria Police media machine has hit the airwaves this morning seeking to justify a case where no less than three of their officers felt it necessary to use firearms on one young man, obviously drug affected or mentally ill or both, wielding two knives.”

This makes the case for disarming the police in public. Has the opposite case ever been made with evidence in the last 40 years?

By: Mary Anne

Mary Anne — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Why do police carry guns anyway? To shoot bank robbers might sound worthy enough but the most likely event is that an innocent by-stander or even several innocent by-standers could be killed or maimed. No matter how threatening a young person may appear be,s/he does not deserve arbitary execution by protectors of the public. A disturbed/distressed young person even may cause a “suicide by cop” situation which should be treated as a cry for help rather than threat to anyone. We need to enforce our gun laws and take guns away from law enforcers.