<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholders apply the AGM blowtorch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/01/shareholders-apply-the-agm-blowtorch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/01/shareholders-apply-the-agm-blowtorch/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny anne kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/01/shareholders-apply-the-agm-blowtorch/#comment-21365</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny anne kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21365</guid>
		<description>With respect to all your commentators the whinging about AGM voting entirely misses the point.Any 100 shareholders can still  put a Resolution to a vote of members either at an AGM or an extraordinary General Meeting.A special resolution can be passed to change the Company&#039;s consitution to require that payment of all management bonuses and remuneration is subject to  prior annual approval by shareholders.this  sort of constitutional change  has already been held by the courts to  permissable and appropriate.Most listed companies appoint external agents to act as Returning Officers and count proxies and there does not appear to be real cogent evidence either that votes are deliberately not counted or are lost.I suspect as Stephen Mayne has regularly pointed out the real issue lies in the manner in which the institutional shareholders exercise their  voting rights on behalf of the funds they manage.Again not a insurmountable issue if institutions are committed to ensuring that executive pay is truly linked to performance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to all your commentators the whinging about AGM voting entirely misses the point.Any 100 shareholders can still  put a Resolution to a vote of members either at an AGM or an extraordinary General Meeting.A special resolution can be passed to change the Company&#8217;s consitution to require that payment of all management bonuses and remuneration is subject to  prior annual approval by shareholders.this  sort of constitutional change  has already been held by the courts to  permissable and appropriate.Most listed companies appoint external agents to act as Returning Officers and count proxies and there does not appear to be real cogent evidence either that votes are deliberately not counted or are lost.I suspect as Stephen Mayne has regularly pointed out the real issue lies in the manner in which the institutional shareholders exercise their  voting rights on behalf of the funds they manage.Again not a insurmountable issue if institutions are committed to ensuring that executive pay is truly linked to performance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Tell</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/01/shareholders-apply-the-agm-blowtorch/#comment-21366</link>
		<dc:creator>William Tell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21366</guid>
		<description>What is a &quot;specter&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a &#8220;specter&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 466/476 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 10:23:17 -->
