Comments on: And the Wankley goes to … Crikey http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/28/and-the-wankley-goes-to-crikey/ now with extra source Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:55:59 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Charlie http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/28/and-the-wankley-goes-to-crikey/#comment-6756 Charlie Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-6756 Well that wasn't very nice of Crikey!<br /><br />I made the mistake of following the link to "Australian Conservative", then more mistakenly reading some of the comments.<br /><br />Any link like that deserves some sort of warning - something along the lines of "WARNING: FANATIC DRIVEL AHEAD".<br /><br />And it was such a nice afternoon till then... Well that wasn’t very nice of Crikey!

I made the mistake of following the link to “Australian Conservative”, then more mistakenly reading some of the comments.

Any link like that deserves some sort of warning - something along the lines of “WARNING: FANATIC DRIVEL AHEAD”.

And it was such a nice afternoon till then…

]]> By: Anne http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/28/and-the-wankley-goes-to-crikey/#comment-6757 Anne Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-6757 Crikey was indeed at egregious fault, which was noted at the time.<br /><br />However, like you, Charlie, I followed the links and, to my bemusement, read that Andrew Bolt positioned Crikey as ' far- Left'. <br /><br />Perhaps if Bolt weren't so tall, dark and handsome I'd care less! Crikey was indeed at egregious fault, which was noted at the time.

However, like you, Charlie, I followed the links and, to my bemusement, read that Andrew Bolt positioned Crikey as ’ far- Left’.

Perhaps if Bolt weren’t so tall, dark and handsome I’d care less!

]]>