<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does Rudd&#8217;s popularity stack up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/25/how-does-rudds-popularity-stack-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/25/how-does-rudds-popularity-stack-up/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:39:15 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/25/how-does-rudds-popularity-stack-up/#comment-20928</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20928</guid>
		<description>Giving means and standard deviations might make your data more presentable but without doing the statistical tests the differences between the means are  err well &#039;meaningless&#039;. A casual look at Rudd&#039;s and Howard&#039;s values show that taking the deviations into consideration there islittle significant difference! Do the math...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving means and standard deviations might make your data more presentable but without doing the statistical tests the differences between the means are  err well &#8216;meaningless&#8217;. A casual look at Rudd&#8217;s and Howard&#8217;s values show that taking the deviations into consideration there islittle significant difference! Do the math&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b.crooks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/25/how-does-rudds-popularity-stack-up/#comment-20929</link>
		<dc:creator>b.crooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20929</guid>
		<description>there`s no doubting the loyalty of the conservative apologists, they can pull figures out of the most dismal performance of the conservatives, and, twist them into ridiculus statistics, and somehow say they indicate a short term for any A.L.P. government, the libs, on current performence,( including Turnbull),don`t look like, or deserve to be returned,they offer no alternatives, only rediculous harping critisism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there`s no doubting the loyalty of the conservative apologists, they can pull figures out of the most dismal performance of the conservatives, and, twist them into ridiculus statistics, and somehow say they indicate a short term for any A.L.P. government, the libs, on current performence,( including Turnbull),don`t look like, or deserve to be returned,they offer no alternatives, only rediculous harping critisism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/25/how-does-rudds-popularity-stack-up/#comment-20930</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20930</guid>
		<description>And what precisely is the point of this navel gazing?   All 5 men were completely diffferent but only 2 of them have not ended up being hated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what precisely is the point of this navel gazing?   All 5 men were completely diffferent but only 2 of them have not ended up being hated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
