Comments on: Richard Farmer’s political bite-sized meaty chunks

By: Kerry

Kerry — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Re the Telegraph’s editor and the poll. It is not surprising that Linnell would allow such a shabby type of poll be conducted in his newspaper. The writings of some of his employees are right up there in shabbysville with his most prized imbocile P Akerman heading the pack. Day after day this pretender attacks the PM on any ground that his masters at Liberal headquarters demand. No matter it is a load of droppings an elephant would be proud of, as long as its derogatory and will appeal to the baying hounds that make up Akermans blog contributors, write it. It is difficult to perceive what the fat mans reward for all this free publicity for the Libs will be. He probably will not be with us next time his friends return to the treasury benches, so whatever feeds his appetite for hate it must be worth his while. Obviously his boss approves, such drivel wouldn’t be tolerated by a responsible editor. We wont go down the Heiner path, Akerman has shown to have a particular private agenda on that one and I doubt it is for the welfare of the woman involved.

By: Zane

Zane — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

The Tele, employer of the tosser Akerman, he who writes what he likes and never ever dare to disagree with his rants, he responds as you would expect from a rude, pathetic, ignorant old man.

By: steve martin

steve martin — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

“A pleasant change at The Oz.”
I imagine that people have become conditioned by the Coalition”s constant references to Labor’s $90Bn debt to regard any deficit as wrong, despite Glenn Stevens remarks on the subject.
I also wonder how the question was framed .What might have been the result If the question asked had been “Which would you prefer - The Government run a deficit or allow large scale unemployment to occur?