Comments on: Internet filtering: Crikey readers respond http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-filtering-crikey-readers-respond/ now with extra source Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:36:07 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: RJG http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-filtering-crikey-readers-respond/#comment-2778 RJG Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2778 The statement "Packet level filtering is so time consuming and expensive that it would take Australian communications back to the Twentieth Century. " has a small error. Australian communications has not yet moved into the Twenty First century, and it only just makes it into the twentieth. Filtering will make communications technologies used in the 19th century quite attractive as an alternative.<br /> The statement “Packet level filtering is so time consuming and expensive that it would take Australian communications back to the Twentieth Century. ” has a small error. Australian communications has not yet moved into the Twenty First century, and it only just makes it into the twentieth. Filtering will make communications technologies used in the 19th century quite attractive as an alternative.

]]> By: Peter http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-filtering-crikey-readers-respond/#comment-2779 Peter Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2779 Imagine Telstra trying to implement a content filter. Hahahahahahahhaahahhahahahaha, they can't even provide reliable broadband.<br /><br />Just make everybody go back to dial-up so that it's too time consuming to download kiddie porn. Imagine Telstra trying to implement a content filter. Hahahahahahahhaahahhahahahaha, they can’t even provide reliable broadband.

Just make everybody go back to dial-up so that it’s too time consuming to download kiddie porn.

]]>