Skip to content

Friday, 21 November 2008

Internet censorship and the Irukandji Jellyfish

by Firstdog

7 Comments

  1. mhawkins1970
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    “unless they are jellyfish perverts” - with lines like these u again showcase the sheer idiocracy of conroy and co in a stingingly humorous tale
    luv your work guv
    go well
    mike

  2. Matt
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    One of your best in a while FD.

    Do all jellyfish use Macs?

  3. stevo the working twistie
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Only the pervert ones Matt.

  4. steven mckiernan
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Small misshapen heads contain small misshapen brains, with small misshapen thoughts.

  5. Frank Birchall
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Another piece of brilliance — loved the Fielding panel!

  6. Little Furry Animal
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    This seems like a good argument for retaining the permit system as a safety net in Aboriginal communities. No offence, whiteness is not personal, it is just a toxic ideology often carried by paedophiles, hawkers, used car salesmen, bureaucrats, politicians and/or assorted tourists.

  7. Cathy
    Posted Friday, 21 November 2008 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Oh to have another pair of Irukandji stilts. Dad made us a pair to watch him prawning in the Parramatta River at Putney circa 1958. After my sister fell off and lost her glasses Mum stopped us from walking over the water because it was too dangerous. But she still let us use the billycart even after the same sister’s dress was ripped to shreds by its rusty wheels during a downhill race. If its not parents its governments using the same silly old skewed management policies simply to show they’re ‘doing something’.