<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who judges the DPPs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/19/who-judges-the-dpps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/19/who-judges-the-dpps/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/19/who-judges-the-dpps/#comment-20931</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20931</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t he phone after the case was finished,&lt;br /&gt;not while it was in progress ?&lt;br /&gt;Doesn&#039;t that make a difference ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t he phone after the case was finished,<br />not while it was in progress ?<br />Doesn&#8217;t that make a difference ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJG</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/19/who-judges-the-dpps/#comment-20932</link>
		<dc:creator>RJG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20932</guid>
		<description>If Rapke wants to voice his concerns to a judge he must meet the following criteria. It must be after the case and all appeals. It must be about process not conclusions and even more importantly he should shut up about it.  People are entitled to voice their opinions in a free society. Judges are not perfect and they should not be sheltered from the opinions of learned pratitioners.  They are quite capable of looking after themselves.  But for Rapke to triumphantly proclaim himself as the keeper of justice for victims in the media is self seeking nonsense. It is appalling. His job is to prosecute the law. He should be struck off immediately or at least a judge might ring him and have a word to him about it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rapke wants to voice his concerns to a judge he must meet the following criteria. It must be after the case and all appeals. It must be about process not conclusions and even more importantly he should shut up about it.  People are entitled to voice their opinions in a free society. Judges are not perfect and they should not be sheltered from the opinions of learned pratitioners.  They are quite capable of looking after themselves.  But for Rapke to triumphantly proclaim himself as the keeper of justice for victims in the media is self seeking nonsense. It is appalling. His job is to prosecute the law. He should be struck off immediately or at least a judge might ring him and have a word to him about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 465/475 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 06:50:07 -->
