Copenhagen is about to become the centre of the world because it’s where the world will meet to decide the collective path forward on climate change. Read some of the best Crikey writing on the issue here.
RBA’s new board game: let the market make the cut
|
For the second month in a row the RBA board decided to boost the recommended interest rate cut from the original recommendation. In November, however, there was a small but important difference. For the first time in a long time, the Reserve Bank was left with a decision to cut rates by one of two amounts: 0.50% or by 0.75%. At the October meeting when the original recommendation was for a 0.50% cut, Governor Glenn Stevens arrived at the meeting with a new recommendation for a 1% cut after credit and other financial markets went into near meltdown. The minutes for the Melbourne Cup Day meeting on November 4 make it clear that Governor Stevens and his executives had again recommended a half a per cent cut, subject to review of developments between the preparation of that recommendation and the board meeting:
That was different to what happened in October when the minutes recorded this:
And what new information emerged from the end of the previous week, when the board papers were sent to members and November 4? The ABS stats on November 3 showing a 1.1% fall in retail sales in September and the house price index for the September quarter fell by 1.8% across the eight capital cities in the survey, which was the sharpest fall for some time. And markets remained nervous, with a credit freeze in place. So it pays to look at and examine the information flow just before an RBA board meetings in turbulent times. That was the same as in October when the volatility in financial markets surged in late September/early October as markets absorbed the impact of the Lehman Brothers collapse and a spate of bailouts in the US and Europe. The November 4 cut of 0.75%, to 5.25% for the cash rate, took the market by surprise for a second month in a row and has led to conspiracy theories among some market commentators and economists who claimed that it was done deliberately to wrong foot the market and to “give” a bigger than expected cut In fact for the second meeting in a row, the board heard that the financial markets had full priced in a cut of 0.50%:
So the board was left to make the choice, which it did by following what the market had been pricing in. And the justification:
The market now has a 0.50% cut priced in for the December 2 meeting, but there’s a chance, once again of 0.75%, according to the futures prices. The justification this time is the bank will need a cut for January because there’s no meeting. So watch for a 0.50% cut and perhaps a January special meeting? Rory Robertson of Macquarie Bank reckons that’s a more than reasonable bet. |
|
|
|












