tip off

Edmund Capon to leave the Art Gallery of NSW

Edmund Capon AM, OBE, who has steered the Art Gallery of NSW to national and international pre-eminence, is at the point of departure.

Having served as director for the past 30 years, Capon is reportedly planning to leave the gallery early in the new year.

A rabid Chelsea supporter and former chairman of Sydney FC, Capon has decided to spend the next few years lecturing, writing and traveling and making greater use of his second home in Italy.

Recruited from London’s Victoria and Albert Museum by the Wran Government in 1978, Capon has made a seminal contribution to the arts. A renowned Chinese art specialist, his crowning achievement was the addition of the Asian wing at the gallery.

During his record tenure, Capon has encouraged well known artists and the private corporate sector to contribute to the gallery’s collection and its blockbuster exhibitions to establish emphatically its worldwide reputation. He has been less successful with his Labor masters who have talked loudly about their commitment to the arts but have a history of squeezing the gallery’s funding.

Perhaps it is an urban legend, but former treasurer Michael Costa is alleged to have attended a meeting of the gallery’s blue chip board of trustees and shocked them with this parting jibe: “I hope you realise that if this place burns down we aren’t going to build another one.”

In September the gallery announced that it was making its biggest-ever acquisition  — Paul Cezanne’s landscape Bords De La Marne for $16.2 million  — to mark Capon’s 30th year in charge.

Artist Margaret Olley gave $1 million, the trustees and other sponsors donated several million and a large group of artists donated paintings which went under the hammer on October 27. But still short of $1.7 million, the gallery has decided to sell two paintings — Brett Whiteley’s Balmoral and John Perceval’s Pleasure Craft  — at Sotheby’s in Melbourne on November 24.

The unusual dispatch of two works by local artists to fund the 1888 Cezanne masterpiece has raised eyebrows among snobs and purists who believe the Whiteley and Perceval should be kept, even if they remain unseen in storage.

The simple explanation is that purchase of the Cezanne, the first to go into the gallery’s collection, has a deadline: the sale must be done and dusted by year’s end so that Capon can make an elegant exit.

Meanwhile, the Labor Government philistines can be expected to hire highly-paid head hunters to find a successor. Candidates will almost certainly be asked: “What is your attitude towards charging entrance fees to the gallery?”

Candidates who give a positive response will move to the short list; those who oppose this Thatcherite robbery will be passed over.

Capon spent years keeping the government’s bean-counters at bay. Ironically, one of the few politicians in Macquarie Street who is dedicated to keeping the gallery free of charge is Opposition leader Barry O’Farrell.

4
  • 1
    paddy
    Posted Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    TM What’s a humble cover charge to you, may well be too much for the truly poor.
    There’s a fine tradition in Oz of free access to public galleries and libraries etc.
    Long may it continue.

  • 2
    davo
    Posted Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    At least NSW is interesting, unlike the snorefest that is SA, or even WA….

  • 3
    Damien Almond
    Posted Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Dear Crikey, why do we get so much of Alex Mitchell? As far as I can tell, the only thing we ever get from him is ridiculous intrigues of NSW, or really Sydney, politics. I know NSW is the biggest state, yada yada. But really, quite frankly nobody outside of Syndey cares, I don’t even read the contributions Alex makes to Crikey anymore.

  • 4
    Tom McLoughlin
    Posted Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Well old bean have to disagree with you there. Why isn’t there a humble entrance fee, with free entrance for say school groups? The gallery is arguably more impressive than the Oz Museum which has a cover. What about the national gallery or Vic Gallery?

    And I’m not talking user pays, rather token of respect. A mere $2 or 3 bucks would be fine. Most free things are treated less than respectfully. Sad but true. Is this one of those sacred cow things? Everywhere has a cover charge to pay for maintenance.

    You imply it’s fine to sell some unique local product to get in a Cezanne. Well maybe. But with a humble cover charge over the years it could have been paid for and no sell offs? I don’t remember getting into the Prado for nothing, or the Louvre if memory serves (?), Gaudi garden was free but not the Sagrada Familia.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...