<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The inflated cost of illegally copied DVDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/the-inflated-cost-of-illegally-copied-dvds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/the-inflated-cost-of-illegally-copied-dvds/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:48:11 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/the-inflated-cost-of-illegally-copied-dvds/#comment-12449</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12449</guid>
		<description>Minister Bib Debus&#039; office has now told us that the $1.77 billion estimate came from Australian Institute of Criminology report entitled &quot;Intellectual property crime and enforcement in Australia, published on their website on 3 October. The report&#039;s Executive Summary says:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The negative impact of IP [intellectual property] crime includes adverse effects on business, the national economy, and consumer health and safety. For example, the software industry has argued that a 10-point drop in piracy globally could create 2.4 million jobs, $400b in economic growth and $67b in additional taxes.&lt;br /&gt;Estimates of the loss to various sectors in Australia include the following: $233m per year due to the piracy and counterfeiting of films (LEK 2006); $677m of lost sales, in 2002, in the Australian toy, software and video games industry. This includes $445.7m lost sales in the business software industry (Allen 2003); $515m in absolute losses in software piracy in 2006 (BSA &amp; IDC 2006); $45m per year as the cost to Australian subscription television industry (ASTRA 2006a); $300m per year in breaches of trade mark as losses to the textile, clothing and footwear  industry (ACAG 2000).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minister Bib Debus&#8217; office has now told us that the $1.77 billion estimate came from Australian Institute of Criminology report entitled &#8220;Intellectual property crime and enforcement in Australia, published on their website on 3 October. The report&#8217;s Executive Summary says:</p>
<p>The negative impact of IP [intellectual property] crime includes adverse effects on business, the national economy, and consumer health and safety. For example, the software industry has argued that a 10-point drop in piracy globally could create 2.4 million jobs, $400b in economic growth and $67b in additional taxes.<br />Estimates of the loss to various sectors in Australia include the following: $233m per year due to the piracy and counterfeiting of films (LEK 2006); $677m of lost sales, in 2002, in the Australian toy, software and video games industry. This includes $445.7m lost sales in the business software industry (Allen 2003); $515m in absolute losses in software piracy in 2006 (BSA &#038; IDC 2006); $45m per year as the cost to Australian subscription television industry (ASTRA 2006a); $300m per year in breaches of trade mark as losses to the textile, clothing and footwear  industry (ACAG 2000).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/the-inflated-cost-of-illegally-copied-dvds/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>Yes, the whole recording/movie conglomerate thing must be managed by old men in bad suits.  They just don&#039;t &#039;get&#039; the Internet at all.  Heck, I&#039;m almost 50 and I get it. The retail cost of CDs and DVDs is simply too high.  The Internet offers a wonderful method for browsing products on an international scale, arranging for purchasing and for distribution, whether by traditional mail or by some form of download.  Sorry, but iTunes is a cop-out as it uses restrictive DRM.  If I use my own computer, my own broadband connection and (probably) my own recording media (CD/DVD) - then I expect to pay less than the bricks &amp; mortar retail price.  The potential for selling media via the Internet is vast, at the moment the process is either heavily restricted (DRM) or the consumer model is just wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the whole recording/movie conglomerate thing must be managed by old men in bad suits.  They just don&#8217;t &#8216;get&#8217; the Internet at all.  Heck, I&#8217;m almost 50 and I get it. The retail cost of CDs and DVDs is simply too high.  The Internet offers a wonderful method for browsing products on an international scale, arranging for purchasing and for distribution, whether by traditional mail or by some form of download.  Sorry, but iTunes is a cop-out as it uses restrictive DRM.  If I use my own computer, my own broadband connection and (probably) my own recording media (CD/DVD) - then I expect to pay less than the bricks &#038; mortar retail price.  The potential for selling media via the Internet is vast, at the moment the process is either heavily restricted (DRM) or the consumer model is just wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/the-inflated-cost-of-illegally-copied-dvds/#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>The industry has really missed a chance with the internet. Instead of embracing the new technology, they have seen it as the enemy and devoted energy into stopping piracy and maintaining their archaic distribution system. It&#039;s only a decade later that they are playing catch-up, yet they are still well behind where the technology and communal consensus is at.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The industry has really shot itself in the foot, it had the chance to capitalise on the new technology and instead it just sat on it&#039;s preferred distribution system despite the social movement away from centralised distribution. Crying poor and suing pirates would do nothing more than have people buy out of guilt / fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The industry has really missed a chance with the internet. Instead of embracing the new technology, they have seen it as the enemy and devoted energy into stopping piracy and maintaining their archaic distribution system. It&#8217;s only a decade later that they are playing catch-up, yet they are still well behind where the technology and communal consensus is at.</p>
<p>The industry has really shot itself in the foot, it had the chance to capitalise on the new technology and instead it just sat on it&#8217;s preferred distribution system despite the social movement away from centralised distribution. Crying poor and suing pirates would do nothing more than have people buy out of guilt / fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
