<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware media hype: Republicans are not doomed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/beware-media-hype-republicans-are-not-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/beware-media-hype-republicans-are-not-doomed/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/beware-media-hype-republicans-are-not-doomed/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>Can I correct a wee error in my piece above? The last sentence in the third last par &quot;Either of those numbers would mean that the swing to Obama among African Americans was actually below the national one.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;should read &quot;Either of those numbers would mean that the swing to Obama among African Americans was not discernibly more than the national one.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My gremlin. Apologies and thankyou.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I correct a wee error in my piece above? The last sentence in the third last par &#8220;Either of those numbers would mean that the swing to Obama among African Americans was actually below the national one.&#8221; </p>
<p>should read &#8220;Either of those numbers would mean that the swing to Obama among African Americans was not discernibly more than the national one.&#8221; </p>
<p>My gremlin. Apologies and thankyou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/beware-media-hype-republicans-are-not-doomed/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>Good article and despite predictions and many reports, turnout was not in fact markedly different than 2004: &lt;br /&gt;http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/11/06/pdf.gansre08turnout.au.pdf&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Despite lofty predictions by some academics, &lt;br /&gt; pundits, and practitioners that voter turnout would reach levels not seen since the turn of the last &lt;br /&gt;century, the percentage of eligible citizens casting ballots in the 2008 presidential election stayed at &lt;br /&gt;virtually the same relatively high level as it reached in the polarized election of 2004. &lt;br /&gt; According to a report and turnout projection released today by American University’s Center for the &lt;br /&gt;Study of the American Electorate (CSAE) and based, in part, on nearly final but unofficial vote &lt;br /&gt;tabulations as compiled by the Associated Press as of 7 p.m. Wednesday, November 5, the &lt;br /&gt;percentage of Americans who cast ballots for president in this year’s presidential election will reach &lt;br /&gt;between 126.5 million and 128.5 million when all votes have been counted by early next month. &quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The media has sold so many lies and ignored so many inconvenient truths during and after this election and this in time I predict will be the real story of this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article and despite predictions and many reports, turnout was not in fact markedly different than 2004: <br /><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/11/06/pdf.gansre08turnout.au.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/11/06/pdf.gansre08turnout.au.pdf</a></p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>Despite lofty predictions by some academics, <br /> pundits, and practitioners that voter turnout would reach levels not seen since the turn of the last <br />century, the percentage of eligible citizens casting ballots in the 2008 presidential election stayed at <br />virtually the same relatively high level as it reached in the polarized election of 2004. <br /> According to a report and turnout projection released today by American University’s Center for the <br />Study of the American Electorate (CSAE) and based, in part, on nearly final but unofficial vote <br />tabulations as compiled by the Associated Press as of 7 p.m. Wednesday, November 5, the <br />percentage of Americans who cast ballots for president in this year’s presidential election will reach <br />between 126.5 million and 128.5 million when all votes have been counted by early next month. &#8220;</p>
<p>The media has sold so many lies and ignored so many inconvenient truths during and after this election and this in time I predict will be the real story of this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Brandham</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/10/beware-media-hype-republicans-are-not-doomed/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Brandham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter, nicely explained. So John Kerry failed to win over the country&#039;s centre and lost the election in 2004. How refreshing to see Americans cheering their president instead of jeering him. For a good look at the out going president please read Justin Franks book : Bush On The Couch. Absolutely frightening. Things are looking up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter, nicely explained. So John Kerry failed to win over the country&#8217;s centre and lost the election in 2004. How refreshing to see Americans cheering their president instead of jeering him. For a good look at the out going president please read Justin Franks book : Bush On The Couch. Absolutely frightening. Things are looking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 497/507 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 11:58:11 -->
