Comments on: Palin off the record is not in the public interest http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:54:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: DavidM http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10561 DavidM Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10561 OK, I'll do it. JamesK, "Thinks Africa is a country", "Doesn't know who's in NAFTA". These are the practically the definition of a person who has not been sufficiently educated or for whom education was a waste of time. The lack of restraint part may yet be hearsay but against the proven parts of the claim? Who cares? OK, I’ll do it. JamesK, “Thinks Africa is a country”, “Doesn’t know who’s in NAFTA”. These are the practically the definition of a person who has not been sufficiently educated or for whom education was a waste of time. The lack of restraint part may yet be hearsay but against the proven parts of the claim? Who cares?

]]> By: JamesK http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10562 JamesK Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10562 What "certain proof"? <br /><br /> What “certain proof”?

]]> By: JamesK http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10563 JamesK Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10563 "Thinks Africa is a country", "Doesn't know who's in NAFTA"....who are you quoting David M?<br /><br />Perhaps a Fox News reporter who heard second hand from somebody "high-up" in the McCain campaign staff?<br /><br />Obama apparently thought the US consists of 57 states. Fortunately for him his error was on video for all to see that as merely as an honest 'slip'.<br /><br />However on your line of 'reasoning' his 'education was a waste of time' (incidentally..what has he done since Uni? He's 47 now....)<br /><br />"OK, I'll do it".....no...... you obviously cannot not. “Thinks Africa is a country”, “Doesn’t know who’s in NAFTA”….who are you quoting David M?

Perhaps a Fox News reporter who heard second hand from somebody “high-up” in the McCain campaign staff?

Obama apparently thought the US consists of 57 states. Fortunately for him his error was on video for all to see that as merely as an honest ‘slip’.

However on your line of ‘reasoning’ his ‘education was a waste of time’ (incidentally..what has he done since Uni? He’s 47 now….)

“OK, I’ll do it”…..no…… you obviously cannot not.

]]> By: Eugene Wong http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10564 Eugene Wong Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10564 The revelations about the true depths of Palin's ignorance are frightening - but not as frightening as the thought that even had this information come to light during the campaign, it appears that a significant percentage of the American public would still have been prepared to vote for her - not McCain, but her personally - had she been running for election. The revelations about the true depths of Palin’s ignorance are frightening - but not as frightening as the thought that even had this information come to light during the campaign, it appears that a significant percentage of the American public would still have been prepared to vote for her - not McCain, but her personally - had she been running for election.

]]> By: JamesK http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10565 JamesK Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10565 No elaboration of Jonathan Greene's "the certain proof that Sarah Palin was a candidate of limited schooling, restraint and intellect". <br /><br />Not surprising coming from Greene, an editor and blogger who apparently is happy that extreme leftist smear and innuendo "should" not "concern us" apparently.<br /><br />Greene pontificating on journalistic standards is equivalent to Mr Baldy lecturing us on appropriate parenting. No elaboration of Jonathan Greene’s “the certain proof that Sarah Palin was a candidate of limited schooling, restraint and intellect”.

Not surprising coming from Greene, an editor and blogger who apparently is happy that extreme leftist smear and innuendo “should” not “concern us” apparently.

Greene pontificating on journalistic standards is equivalent to Mr Baldy lecturing us on appropriate parenting.

]]> By: Ivan http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/palin-off-the-record-is-not-in-the-public-interest/#comment-10566 Ivan Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-10566 More frightening than Sarah Palin's alleged lack of knowledge is that the current President is even worse. OPEC in Austria, that should have been APEC in Australia. His creation of new meaningless words. Come on, the guy didn't even know anything about anywhere outside of Texas. <br /><br />Let's face it, Sarah Palin is perfect Republican material! Thicker than a Besser brick with a matching interlect. More frightening than Sarah Palin’s alleged lack of knowledge is that the current President is even worse. OPEC in Austria, that should have been APEC in Australia. His creation of new meaningless words. Come on, the guy didn’t even know anything about anywhere outside of Texas.

Let’s face it, Sarah Palin is perfect Republican material! Thicker than a Besser brick with a matching interlect.

]]>