http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-the-daily-tele-photo-gallery-monkey/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:47:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-the-daily-tele-photo-gallery-monkey/#comment-18267 Tom W Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-18267 A well deserved Wankley - but keep the galleries coming:P A well deserved Wankley - but keep the galleries coming:P

]]> http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-the-daily-tele-photo-gallery-monkey/#comment-18268 steve martin Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-18268 "an additional teaser to compliment this morning's top story" - yet another who apparently doesn't know the difference between compliment and complement.<br />Sorry can't help a little nit pick. “an additional teaser to compliment this morning’s top story” - yet another who apparently doesn’t know the difference between compliment and complement.
Sorry can’t help a little nit pick.

]]> http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-the-daily-tele-photo-gallery-monkey/#comment-18269 Jen Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-18269 Disappointingly, this is the second time they've run this gallery. I was rather hoping for a new range of sex-mad teachers, or perhaps sex mad students. Still not as good as the 47 photos of boobs they ran under a story about a breast war between the Kardashian sisters. Does anyone else feel that sometimes the Tele should run a not safe for work warning? Their Summernats photo were certainly rather risque. Disappointingly, this is the second time they’ve run this gallery. I was rather hoping for a new range of sex-mad teachers, or perhaps sex mad students. Still not as good as the 47 photos of boobs they ran under a story about a breast war between the Kardashian sisters. Does anyone else feel that sometimes the Tele should run a not safe for work warning? Their Summernats photo were certainly rather risque.

]]>