Comments on: The case for internet filtering http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/ now with extra source Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:34:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kel http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/#comment-16647 Kel Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-16647 Brilliant! I'm still bemused as to how Labor think that mandatory filtering for everyone is a good idea - especially seeing how slow an internet service we get already. Is it really just pandering to the "moral crusaders?" Brilliant! I’m still bemused as to how Labor think that mandatory filtering for everyone is a good idea - especially seeing how slow an internet service we get already. Is it really just pandering to the “moral crusaders?”

]]> By: paddy http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/#comment-16648 paddy Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-16648 Oh Yes.....After yesterday's gut-wrenching classic..... <br />We get a joyfully funny tease. <br /><br />Come on Dog.....We all want to see it. <br />Just give us the URL. and we promise not to tell the silly Stevens who leaked it. Oh Yes…..After yesterday’s gut-wrenching classic…..
We get a joyfully funny tease.

Come on Dog…..We all want to see it.
Just give us the URL. and we promise not to tell the silly Stevens who leaked it.

]]> By: mike smith http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/#comment-16649 mike smith Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-16649 Yes, he is stupid. It seems to be a prerequisite for Ministers of Communication, or whatever the label of the day is.<br /><br /> Yes, he is stupid. It seems to be a prerequisite for Ministers of Communication, or whatever the label of the day is.

]]>