<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogwatch: David Marr and the latest Bill Henson debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/07/blogwatch-david-marr-and-the-latest-bill-henson-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/07/blogwatch-david-marr-and-the-latest-bill-henson-debate/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:34:24 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/07/blogwatch-david-marr-and-the-latest-bill-henson-debate/#comment-16291</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16291</guid>
		<description>Maher&#039;s snooty &quot;please listen&quot; to Fran Kelly on RN&#039;s breakfast on Monday morning when she was giving the book a free publicity run (no doubt to a large number of the potential readership was enough to make the gathered tribe at the breakfast table reach for the dictionary to look up &quot;supercilious&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Indeed Maher&#039;s dismissal of the views of others wins him no friends round these parts - I happen to agree with much of what he says, but gee, I don&#039;t like the way he says it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Great plug on the ABC for the book though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maher&#8217;s snooty &#8220;please listen&#8221; to Fran Kelly on RN&#8217;s breakfast on Monday morning when she was giving the book a free publicity run (no doubt to a large number of the potential readership was enough to make the gathered tribe at the breakfast table reach for the dictionary to look up &#8220;supercilious&#8221;. </p>
<p>Indeed Maher&#8217;s dismissal of the views of others wins him no friends round these parts - I happen to agree with much of what he says, but gee, I don&#8217;t like the way he says it.</p>
<p>Great plug on the ABC for the book though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMB</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/07/blogwatch-david-marr-and-the-latest-bill-henson-debate/#comment-16292</link>
		<dc:creator>CMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16292</guid>
		<description>How could you tell whether he was being supercilious if he was on the radio? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could you tell whether he was being supercilious if he was on the radio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
