<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rundle: No one expected this, no one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:29:08 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knuck</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>Knuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>John McCain alluded to Wall Street becoming a casino, so why not exercise casino owner&#039;s methods; closely monitor the dealers and gamblers to ensure no fraud, cheating or colluding. Those detected are fired, evicted and banned after being dispossessed of their ill gotten gains.&lt;br /&gt;So Wall Street and other stock exchanges will have to be owned in order to implement the above. But who will own the stock exchanges? Why, government of course. And the monitors? FBI, CIA, ASIO, ASIS MIs 5 and 6 etc etc. Get them to do useful work, make a profit and we all get rich. No more income tax. Hooray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain alluded to Wall Street becoming a casino, so why not exercise casino owner&#8217;s methods; closely monitor the dealers and gamblers to ensure no fraud, cheating or colluding. Those detected are fired, evicted and banned after being dispossessed of their ill gotten gains.<br />So Wall Street and other stock exchanges will have to be owned in order to implement the above. But who will own the stock exchanges? Why, government of course. And the monitors? FBI, CIA, ASIO, ASIS MIs 5 and 6 etc etc. Get them to do useful work, make a profit and we all get rich. No more income tax. Hooray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7160</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7160</guid>
		<description>Careful David Sanderson, the inherent condescension of your leftist pseudo-intellectual elitism is showing again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful David Sanderson, the inherent condescension of your leftist pseudo-intellectual elitism is showing again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7161</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7161</guid>
		<description>&lt;br /&gt;So it happens when democracy is replaced by oligarchy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oligarchy has no wings attached, Left or Right, Mr. JamesK.  It just suffers from  golden calf syndrome.&lt;br /&gt;Even primary school  kids know that one cannot drive a car without petrol, and  regular check-ups of the engine, brakes and indicators.. &lt;br /&gt;But according to some political systems &#039;experts&#039;, if you do check up your car regularly, you are a &#039;leftist pseudo-intellectual&#039;  and a socialist.  And if you don&#039;t- you are a &#039;right wing  true- blue intellectual&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;In our overregulated, overtaxed and over controlled  world  it is a bid odd that  banks should  be an  exception and treated like a free spirit taken on a ride on a merry-go-round with no screws and bolts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it happens when democracy is replaced by oligarchy. </p>
<p>Oligarchy has no wings attached, Left or Right, Mr. JamesK.  It just suffers from  golden calf syndrome.<br />Even primary school  kids know that one cannot drive a car without petrol, and  regular check-ups of the engine, brakes and indicators.. <br />But according to some political systems &#8216;experts&#8217;, if you do check up your car regularly, you are a &#8216;leftist pseudo-intellectual&#8217;  and a socialist.  And if you don&#8217;t- you are a &#8216;right wing  true- blue intellectual&#8217;.<br />In our overregulated, overtaxed and over controlled  world  it is a bid odd that  banks should  be an  exception and treated like a free spirit taken on a ride on a merry-go-round with no screws and bolts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris from Edgecliff</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7162</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris from Edgecliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7162</guid>
		<description>Guy Rundle, for someone who calls himself a &quot;US Correspondent&quot; in DC, you should know that Senator Judd Gregg is most certainly not Senate minority leader - Senator Mitch McConnell holds that title (although admittedly probably not for much longer). Senator Gregg is ranking minority member of the Banking Committee </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy Rundle, for someone who calls himself a &#8220;US Correspondent&#8221; in DC, you should know that Senator Judd Gregg is most certainly not Senate minority leader - Senator Mitch McConnell holds that title (although admittedly probably not for much longer). Senator Gregg is ranking minority member of the Banking Committee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Shane are you implying some Bush &quot;oligarchy&quot; is responsible for the meltdown on Wall St.?&lt;br /&gt;If you are then you would be quite incorrect as well as rationally incoherent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cause is poor regulatory authorities in the USA, decisions in the Clinton Administration and a lack of decisions in the Bush Administration&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keating and Costello are to be congratulated for sensible regulation here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A regulatory authority with teeth does not equate to state sponsored industries or even worse nationalisation of industry even if it is the financial industry full of &#039;evil&#039; bankers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane are you implying some Bush &#8220;oligarchy&#8221; is responsible for the meltdown on Wall St.?<br />If you are then you would be quite incorrect as well as rationally incoherent.</p>
<p>The cause is poor regulatory authorities in the USA, decisions in the Clinton Administration and a lack of decisions in the Bush Administration</p>
<p>Keating and Costello are to be congratulated for sensible regulation here.</p>
<p>A regulatory authority with teeth does not equate to state sponsored industries or even worse nationalisation of industry even if it is the financial industry full of &#8216;evil&#8217; bankers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7164</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sanderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7164</guid>
		<description>Intrade has Obama at 62.5 - up 5.5 on the day. McCain is going the same way as Wall St.&lt;br /&gt;IMHO Obama is still a good bet at these odds, you could make some money to offset your stock market losses.&lt;br /&gt;I wonder what Palin will have to say in Thursday&#039;s debate about the situation? That should be good for a few laughs to relieve the gloom. Although that smiley way she has when talking complete tosh will no doubt  persuade some Americans that she is their kind of gal and just like them - ie a paragon of fools among fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intrade has Obama at 62.5 - up 5.5 on the day. McCain is going the same way as Wall St.<br />IMHO Obama is still a good bet at these odds, you could make some money to offset your stock market losses.<br />I wonder what Palin will have to say in Thursday&#8217;s debate about the situation? That should be good for a few laughs to relieve the gloom. Although that smiley way she has when talking complete tosh will no doubt  persuade some Americans that she is their kind of gal and just like them - ie a paragon of fools among fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>Shane I did politely point out that your post was rationally incoherent......&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just re-read it to be sure....yep. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I could also say apple pie is good and then mention your name: &#039;Shane&#039; and allude to your post and then protest in a similar manner to you that nowhere did you emphatically say &quot;apple pie is good&quot; and ....... that would make about as much sense as your response....and indeed your primary post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane I did politely point out that your post was rationally incoherent&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I just re-read it to be sure&#8230;.yep. </p>
<p>I could also say apple pie is good and then mention your name: &#8216;Shane&#8217; and allude to your post and then protest in a similar manner to you that nowhere did you emphatically say &#8220;apple pie is good&#8221; and &#8230;&#8230;. that would make about as much sense as your response&#8230;.and indeed your primary post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7166</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7166</guid>
		<description>JamesK&lt;br /&gt;I did not mention Bush. I said &#039;oligarchy&#039; has no political wings. And I did not mention Australia. You probably misread my message. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JamesK<br />I did not mention Bush. I said &#8216;oligarchy&#8217; has no political wings. And I did not mention Australia. You probably misread my message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/30/rundle-no-one-expected-this-no-one/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sanderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>JamesK, don&#039;t you mean that the showing condescension of your pseudo-inherent leftism is eliting again? &lt;br /&gt;Makes more sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JamesK, don&#8217;t you mean that the showing condescension of your pseudo-inherent leftism is eliting again? <br />Makes more sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
