Comments on: How The Australian disgraced itself over Macquarie http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/19/how-the-australian-disgraced-itself-over-macquarie/ now with extra source Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:36:07 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Ian http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/19/how-the-australian-disgraced-itself-over-macquarie/#comment-19687 Ian Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-19687 Why was Greg Baxter the first to note that Macquarie is a (significant?) advertiser on Crikey? If you want to keep calling people on conflicts you have to do this yourself.<br /><br />What is your response? How significant an advertiser are they? Why was Greg Baxter the first to note that Macquarie is a (significant?) advertiser on Crikey? If you want to keep calling people on conflicts you have to do this yourself.

What is your response? How significant an advertiser are they?

]]> By: Frank Birchall http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/19/how-the-australian-disgraced-itself-over-macquarie/#comment-19688 Frank Birchall Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-19688 Rather than continuing with a "he said, they said, I said" approach, can we get the facts relating to the borrowings. That is to say, is the assertion by Adele Ferguson about $45 billion of borrowings having to be refinanced in the next 6, 9 or 12 months materially true or not? Rather than continuing with a “he said, they said, I said” approach, can we get the facts relating to the borrowings. That is to say, is the assertion by Adele Ferguson about $45 billion of borrowings having to be refinanced in the next 6, 9 or 12 months materially true or not?

]]>