<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary campaigns for Obama, declines to attack Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/10/hillary-campaigns-for-obama-declines-to-attack-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/10/hillary-campaigns-for-obama-declines-to-attack-palin/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venise Alstergren</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/10/hillary-campaigns-for-obama-declines-to-attack-palin/#comment-13039</link>
		<dc:creator>Venise Alstergren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13039</guid>
		<description>In my honest opinion, today&#039;s love of &#039;Celebrities&#039; will work against Obama. Yeah, it&#039;s a good idea for the Dems&lt;br /&gt;to project themselves as solid and fiscally reliable. To reflect stability. Regrettably this is perceived as boring by a huge slice of the voting public. Whereas Sarah Palin&#039;s sudden appearance out of nowhere-as I imagine a lot of the voters think of Alaska-together with her aura of stardom has made her an instant celebrity.With a massive&lt;br /&gt;dose of hindsight I think Hillary Clinton might have been the one to take Palin on. Say what you want about Hillary, but she too has star power. As I said, my hindsight is functioning very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my honest opinion, today&#8217;s love of &#8216;Celebrities&#8217; will work against Obama. Yeah, it&#8217;s a good idea for the Dems<br />to project themselves as solid and fiscally reliable. To reflect stability. Regrettably this is perceived as boring by a huge slice of the voting public. Whereas Sarah Palin&#8217;s sudden appearance out of nowhere-as I imagine a lot of the voters think of Alaska-together with her aura of stardom has made her an instant celebrity.With a massive<br />dose of hindsight I think Hillary Clinton might have been the one to take Palin on. Say what you want about Hillary, but she too has star power. As I said, my hindsight is functioning very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 434/444 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 18:32:17 -->
