Nathan Rees carries baggage from the Orkopolous scandal
|
The ascension of Nathan Rees to the top job in NSW has inevitably piqued media interest in his role in the discovery of former Minister Milton Orkopoulos’s paedophilia and drug use, and his subsequent conviction and imprisonment. Gillian Sneddon, who was at the centre of the case, has spent recent days fielding inquiries from the Sydney media, suddenly interested again in her treatment at the hands of the NSW Government. So rapid has been Rees’s rise that it’s only two years since The Australian was misspelling his name in connection with the case. Rees, like a number of former Government MPs, including Morris Iemma and John Watkins, has been dogged by the question of when he first knew of allegations about Orkopoulos’s behaviour. Rees’s consistent line has been that, despite being the then-Minister’s chief of staff, he knew nothing until everyone found out about Orkopoulos’s secret life in November 2006. In his answer to Parliament on the question, Rees noted that he left Orkopoulos’s office on Friday 4 August 2006 (Iemma had asked Rees to join his staff). According to Sneddon, it was on the following Monday that Orkopoulos called in police in an effort to address the circulation of a statutory declaration alleging he was a paedophile. There had been allegations against Orkopoulos in October 2005, made by the victim in the Minister’s office to his staff, including Sneddon. When advised of the claims, Orkopoulos reacted with fury and asked a Lake Macquarie police officer to “warn off” the individual. He then assured Sneddon — whom he had known since the early 1990s when he, Sneddon and his future wife Kathy worked together in the office of Labor MP Don Bowman — that he had spoken to police about the claims. Orkopoulos also told Newcastle MP Bryce Gaudry, with whom Sneddon had raised the allegations, and Legislative Councillor Janice Burnswood that he had referred the matter to the police. Rees was his chief of staff at this point, and there are claims Orkopoulos’s driver was a witness to the “warning off”. When he learnt of the 2006 statutory declaration, Orkopoulos asked Sneddon to fax a copy of the declaration to then-Police Minister Carl Scully, and asked her to arrange a police interview for him. But the claims in the statutory declaration were never raised in Orkopoulos’s trial. Instead, when police arrived to discuss it with Orkopoulos, he was not available and police instead spoke to Sneddon, who mentioned the 2005 allegations. They would become the basis on which he was charged and convicted. Orkopoulos relied on deferring suspicion by telling colleagues and staff that he had referred allegations about himself to police. He was also, clearly, adept at keeping his sexual activities and drug use secret. There is no evidence that Rees has misled Parliament in his denials about knowing about allegations relating to Orkopoulos. There is only the fact that Rees’s tenure as chief of staff coincided with the 2005 allegations, which several staff and two MPs knew about, and that he left Orkopoulos’s office only three days before the latter attempted to deal with a statutory declaration about his activities, including by giving it to another Minister. A number of significant questions remain unanswered about the Iemma Government’s response to Orkopoulos’s crimes. Sneddon has repeatedly claimed, and produced evidence, that when she advised Parliamentary staff in September 2006 that she was assisting a confidential police investigation into Orkopoulos’s activities, that this information was immediately passed on to Orkopoulos. It was at that point that Sneddon was locked out of the MP’s office. No inquiry has ever been undertaken into the behaviour of the Parliamentary staff, which according to Sneddon infuriated NSW Police investigating the politician. An attempt by the NSW Opposition to establish an inquiry this year into both the behaviour of Parliamentary staff and the subsequent treatment of Sneddon was derailed in June by the Government and Fred Nile and replaced with a general whistleblower inquiry. Submissions to the inquiry closed a fortnight ago. It won’t get to the bottom of who did and didn’t know about Orkopoulos, or why he was informed of the investigation into him by Parliamentary staff. But of the politicians involved, Rees is the last man standing in the affair. Iemma, Scully, his replacement as Police Minister John Watkins, Gaudry, and Burnswood have all left politics. In the absence of a full inquiry, Rees begins his premiership with serious questions unresolved. |
|
|
|
10 Comments
Tom and Kevin…don’t you think for one moment Gillian Sneddon hasn’t desperately tried and failed to have the facts of who knew what and when brought to public attention? Who do you guys think is blocking her calls for a full inquiry….do you think a string of past and current MPs, parliamentary and ministerial staff want reputations and jobs trashed, or the nerds sitting in ALP head office already looking like detention centre candidates to look worse? And no, O’Farrell doesn’t want the whole fiasco spotlighted because it makes his lot look like bunch of keystone cops who similarly would fall foul of an inquiry that would well make certain recommendations all bound to curb that lots behaviours too. Simply ask yourself why Milton’s other victims have been given relative justice, why his wife is now employed with the local federal ALP member who fundraised on her behalf and why no one is lifting a finger to give Gillian encouragement or support. The ignominy of the state ALP descending into a mire at the hands of its own stupid leaders is just too much for the party to bear.
Tom and Kevin - agree about “put up or shut up”. And Sneddon has put up - she has shown that Parliamentary staff leaked the confidential police investigation directly to Orkopoulos. This has never been investigated. She has shown that a number of MPs knew about allegations, in addition to herself and other staff. The Iemma Government prevented a proper investigation of these issues. A full inquiry may well show that Orkopoulos kept his criminality secret from Rees just like he kept it secret from his family. I’ve no reason to suspect otherwise of Rees since I know nothing about him. But in the absence of a proper inquiry, I think the question about his involvement needs to be asked - obviously, since I wrote the article. “Put up or shut up” shouldn’t be a reason not to ask such questions.
Tom and Kevin…don’t you think for one moment Gillian Sneddon hasn’t desperately tried and failed to have the facts of who knew what and when brought to public attention? Who do you guys think is blocking her calls for a full inquiry….do you think a string of past and current MPs, parliamentary and ministerial staff want reputations and jobs trashed, or the nerds sitting in ALP head office already looking like detention centre candidates to look worse? And no, O’Farrell doesn’t want the whole fiasco spotlighted because it makes his lot look like bunch of keystone cops who similarly would fall foul of an inquiry that would well make certain recommendations all bound to curb that lots behaviours too. Simply ask yourself why Milton’s other victims have been given relative justice, why his wife is now employed with the local federal ALP member who fundraised on her behalf and why no one is lifting a finger to give Gillian encouragement or support. The ignominy of the state ALP descending into a mire at the hands of its own stupid leaders is just too much for the party to bear.
Tom McLoughlin has saved me the need to arrive at exactly his final deduction…end the cheap talk & put up or shut up…thanx Tom.
Oh dear…apologies for the multiple comments…the submit button didn’t work so I just kept pressing!
The more I hear about the fallout from the Orkopoulos scandal, the more incredulous I am that there hasn’t been a high-level inquiry into the treatment of his electorate officer by those ‘loyal’ to that creep or a review of some of his more questionable decisions in office. That the Liberals haven’t fought tooth and nail to highlight this must indicate they’ve got some similar skeletons in closets somewhere. Honestly, why would a political party NOT seek to portray their opponents as trying to cover up for a paedophile when the facts are clearly with them?
Tom and Kevin…don’t you think for one moment Gillian Sneddon hasn’t desperately tried and failed to have the facts of who knew what and when brought to public attention? Who do you guys think is blocking her calls for a full inquiry….do you think a string of past and current MPs, parliamentary and ministerial staff want reputations and jobs trashed, or the nerds sitting in ALP head office already looking like detention centre candidates to look worse? And no, O’Farrell doesn’t want the whole fiasco spotlighted because it makes his lot look like bunch of keystone cops who similarly would fall foul of an inquiry that would well make certain recommendations all bound to curb that lots behaviours too. Simply ask yourself why Milton’s other victims have been given relative justice, why his wife is now employed with the local federal ALP member who fundraised on her behalf and why no one is lifting a finger to give Gillian encouragement or support. The ignominy of the state ALP descending into a mire at the hands of its own stupid leaders is just too much for the party to bear.
Mmm. The allegation when you boil it down is that big Nathan was/is too smart and industrious not to have known or suspected. It is surprising to me (admittedly with a melodramatic streak) that he didn’t know UNLESS perhaps Ork was the proverbial absentee Minister while Rees actually was too busy keeping the show on the road, ironically making too much spare time for his boss to do his crimes.
But like any whisper or attempted smear it really does come down to put up or shut up. It’s a pretty good rule of public life. If anyone can prove anything I don’t doubt there is a big fat cheque book journalist ready to pay for it. Personally I don’t want to play in a political community where innuendo replaces evidence when it comes to knowledge of criminality. Otherwise we just live in a jungle of the most expensive PR operatives and the big blaring front page shout.
Questions might remain but arguably plenty of time has elapsed to reveal anything adverse too. Which just leaves cheap talk I guess.
The NSW Labor Government would appear to have no shortage of skeletons in their collective closets. The Orkopoulos matter, the numerous NSW Crime Commission issues which are repeatedly swept under the Kent St carpet, the acknowledged but ignored wrongdoings of the PIC, the sham of the “Iguanagate” incident, not to mention the failing health and teaching programs as well as the overall lack of any punishment being dished out for a crime, which would actually reflect the community’s expectations. Good luck Nathan. The ship is beyond repair.
also, isn’t one of the things of pa*dophiles is that they ARE sneaky? They ARE discreet? I don’t have any problem believing Rees when he says he didn’t know. I don’t think he did. Rees may become the biggest dud in NSW history (but then, I don’t believe the Daily Telegraph either) but I think in this case, he’s innocent.