<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:29:53 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-10098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10098</guid>
		<description>Good grief where does Neil James come up with this stuff. The Vietnam War-in which a million Vietnamese died needlessly was begun because of the phoney &quot;domino effect&quot; whereby country by country would fall to communism unless checked ( no doubt a theory James would have prescribed to at the time). It didn&#039;t happen. Why does James find an excuse for every ghastly war in which thousands die and those who perpetuate the war are never  wrong ?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief where does Neil James come up with this stuff. The Vietnam War-in which a million Vietnamese died needlessly was begun because of the phoney &#8220;domino effect&#8221; whereby country by country would fall to communism unless checked ( no doubt a theory James would have prescribed to at the time). It didn&#8217;t happen. Why does James find an excuse for every ghastly war in which thousands die and those who perpetuate the war are never  wrong ?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Henderson-Pinochet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-10099</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Henderson-Pinochet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10099</guid>
		<description>Neil James parrots the usual crap about the Vietnam war. It was a vicious amoral war against a civilian population, employing mass civilian bombings, the deliberate destruction of agriculture to starve the north, and an utter indifference to the means in pursuit of a geopolitical end. Nothing could illustrate the conscious evil of the ADA, the NCC, Santamaria, the mainstream Catholic church and all who sailed in her than James&#039;s remark. He still doesn&#039;t understand that Vietnam is the place where the west finally lost all moral authority. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil James parrots the usual crap about the Vietnam war. It was a vicious amoral war against a civilian population, employing mass civilian bombings, the deliberate destruction of agriculture to starve the north, and an utter indifference to the means in pursuit of a geopolitical end. Nothing could illustrate the conscious evil of the ADA, the NCC, Santamaria, the mainstream Catholic church and all who sailed in her than James&#8217;s remark. He still doesn&#8217;t understand that Vietnam is the place where the west finally lost all moral authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Barns</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>I note that Dick Smith has still not answered this question -why is he pursuing the Tasmanian National Parks Association for legal costs when he can well afford to absorb the $50,000 himself?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Secondly, Greens sources have told me for sometime now that they are not happy with Bob Brown&#039;s refusal to criticise Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that Dick Smith has still not answered this question -why is he pursuing the Tasmanian National Parks Association for legal costs when he can well afford to absorb the $50,000 himself?</p>
<p>Secondly, Greens sources have told me for sometime now that they are not happy with Bob Brown&#8217;s refusal to criticise Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la derriere du cochon</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-10101</link>
		<dc:creator>la derriere du cochon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10101</guid>
		<description>I think John Goldbaum is right about Brendan Nelson exiting the leadership.  Philip Coorey jumped to the wrong conclusion in the SMH today when he wrote that Turnbull&#039;s week-long European holiday is a subtle hint that he won&#039;t challenge next week.  I&#039;d say Turnbull has taken the last chance to re-charge his batteries and spend some quality time with his wife before ascending the full-on leadership job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think John Goldbaum is right about Brendan Nelson exiting the leadership.  Philip Coorey jumped to the wrong conclusion in the SMH today when he wrote that Turnbull&#8217;s week-long European holiday is a subtle hint that he won&#8217;t challenge next week.  I&#8217;d say Turnbull has taken the last chance to re-charge his batteries and spend some quality time with his wife before ascending the full-on leadership job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goldbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/09/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-10102</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goldbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10102</guid>
		<description>Not only that, but does Brendan Nelson mean he&#039;ll still be the most unpopular opposition leader in history when he says he &quot;can assure that in two years&#039;time, [he&#039;ll] be in this position&quot;, according to the Philip Coorey piece you mentioned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but does Brendan Nelson mean he&#8217;ll still be the most unpopular opposition leader in history when he says he &#8220;can assure that in two years&#8217;time, [he&#8217;ll] be in this position&#8221;, according to the Philip Coorey piece you mentioned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
