Wall St was down 94 overnight, its biggest fall in a month, while the local market is down 66.
Fairfax to slash 5% of full time workforce
|
Fairfax staff were greeted this morning with an email in their inbox from CEO David Kirk and Deputy CEO Brian McCarthy. The email (read the full email on Crikey) advised that Fairfax were embarking on a “major restructure”, effectively immediately — specifically, that Fairfax were slashing 5%, or 550 heads, from their full time staff:
According to the Fairfax email to staff, the number of redundancies across Australia and New Zealand will be approximately 550, across “many areas of the business”. Fairfax advised that “approximately 30% of the redundancies affect editorial staff in Australia and New Zealand (and for New Zealand this includes staff already affected by the previously announced editorial project in subediting).” Another 180 employees will be reassigned in “restructuring” such as the introduction of “changes and efficiencies” in Sydney, including ”most areas of the business, including editorial, publishing services, marketing and newspaper sales, the contact centres, and the editorial library.” This includes a significant overhaul of the working process in Sydney:
For The Age in Melbourne, the strategy going forward will include “reviews of operating, production and support processes in all areas, including editorial, to ensure optimal employment of staff and technology, and including outsourcing of elements that will not impact our quality position. As a result of this program, a number of positions will likely be declared redundant.” To the rest of the world, Fairfax announced that it was implementing a ”business improvement program”. According to the ASX statement (read the full statement on Crikey):
“Media companies fit for the modern media world need to be lean and agile. This far-reaching program will position us well for the next stage of our growth and development,” said CEO Fairfax David Kirk. And in an email to all Fairfax Victorian staff, Don Churchill, Chief Executive & Publisher of Vic Metropolitan & Community Publishing explained:
In order to “ensure the continuing productivity and growth of The Age in both a financial sense and as a business model to truly support us becoming an integrated media company, we are now moving from a transition of our business into a transformation of our business,” said Churchill. He outlined the “key elements” of The Age’s ”transformation of the business”:
Churchill also explained that management would “aggressively look at all areas of discretionary spending” including “a deferral of wage reviews for senior management, a reduction in our overall marketing spend, a refinement of our interstate newspaper sales program, a reduction in fringe benefits such as taxi use, parking and canteen subsidies.” As for redundancies, staffing levels will be reduced “via redundancy programs following reviews of operating and support processes in all departments, on the corporate and business side as well as editorial”:
“This is a difficult yet necessary step for The Age. It is a significant undertaking. It’s a transformation of our business. It won’t be easy,” acknowledged Churchill. ”It’s in all our interests that we do this professionally over a short period of time. We will get through this, and we will focus on supporting the people affected by this announcement and we will also focus on keeping The Age strong through and beyond this transformation.” Mike Dobby of the MEAA told Crikey, “We find the decision extremely disappointing and symbolic of Fairfax’s low cost discounted approach to journalism. Based on the company email it would seem 120 positions are under threat at The SMH and The Age, which is 8-10% of journalists on those papers.”
“Clearly as they are already under resourced the quality will be further discounted. It’s bad news for journalists and the company and especially bad news for the communities served by those papers,” said Dobby.
“It’s at odds with other news publications to invest in low cost discounted approach to journalism — which is the wrong approach to take at this time. Ultimately it means that readers and other Fairfax publications are the losers. Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) federal secretary Chris Warren said this morning that the union would meet Fairfax management at lunchtime on Tuesday and organise a meeting with staff later on Tuesday or Wednesday to decide what to do. The standard redundancy payout formula for editorial staff was four weeks pay for every year of service, Mr Warren said. As for the ACT, this reassuring memo from General Manager Ken Nichols went out to all staff at The Canberra Times this morning:
Listen to Chris Warren of the MEAA speak to Ali Moore on 774 this morning about the cuts here |
|
|
|














3 Comments
The new get up of the Sydney Daily Telegraph looks like the old South Coast Register (Batemans Bay NSW) with some colour trimming. One difference, there’s a liftout with a liftout and don’t forget the liftout in there. But the editor Penberthy likes it so that’s the main thing I guess. Meanwhile over at Fairfax the notion that a profit driven corporation as opposed to a trust or mutual cares about good news service looks about to get another thrashing. That 5% ought to contact eachother and combine to float a business that shares equal equity amongst its staff and management. As they profit they share equally in that. That’s a news business I reckon. If those staff don’t start investing in their own equity … well more fool them really.
The sad part about David Kirks’s cost cutting is it will produce short term benefits to shareholders, management. Long term it is down the gurgler, for all. What isnt debated is the failure of Fairfax to grasp how old and new media can meld - then again who has here. We can all look forward to more forward thinking media outfits from abroad running largely hackless (local) publications. Even sadder, few will notice the difference. If I may suggest one cost David should incur, it would be to appoint someone with half a brain who might occasionally suggest an innovation or two for Fairfax. Now wouldnt that be remarkable.
The sad part about David Kirks’s cost cutting is it will produce short term benefits to shareholders, management. Long term it is down the gurgler, for all. What isnt debated is the failure of Fairfax to grasp how old and new media can meld - then again who has here. We can all look forward to more forward thinking media outfits from abroad running largely hackless (local) publications. Even sadder, few will notice the difference. If I may suggest one cost David should incur, it would be to appoint someone with half a brain who might occasionally suggest an innovation or two for Fairfax. Now wouldnt that be remarkable.