<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phoenix companies: a lurk on the rise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/18/phoenix-companies-a-lurk-on-the-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/18/phoenix-companies-a-lurk-on-the-rise/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Heimann</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/18/phoenix-companies-a-lurk-on-the-rise/#comment-20961</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Heimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20961</guid>
		<description>Phoenix company problems were not &quot;discovered&quot; by the ATO in 1998. They were one of the major reasons posited by the ATO for the revenue leakage (flood really) systemic in the old Sales Tax system. Been around for generations and the GST has done bugger all to fix them. Of course the ATO chased company directors of phoenix companies going back to the 1970&#039;s (and before) with some but not much success. Nothing has changed and at the end of the day the ATO still has to demonstrate that the companies have gone into liquidation to escape their tax liabilities. Used to be that the law said you had to pay tax debts before anyone else got a look in - not any more. No matter which way you look there&#039;s nothing new in tax cheating but it&#039;s getting harder and harder to prove the cheats are cheating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoenix company problems were not &#8220;discovered&#8221; by the ATO in 1998. They were one of the major reasons posited by the ATO for the revenue leakage (flood really) systemic in the old Sales Tax system. Been around for generations and the GST has done bugger all to fix them. Of course the ATO chased company directors of phoenix companies going back to the 1970&#8217;s (and before) with some but not much success. Nothing has changed and at the end of the day the ATO still has to demonstrate that the companies have gone into liquidation to escape their tax liabilities. Used to be that the law said you had to pay tax debts before anyone else got a look in - not any more. No matter which way you look there&#8217;s nothing new in tax cheating but it&#8217;s getting harder and harder to prove the cheats are cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mervyn Langford</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/18/phoenix-companies-a-lurk-on-the-rise/#comment-20962</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervyn Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20962</guid>
		<description>Does the apparent problems the ATO is having with James Hardy (+/- $230m in outstanding taxes and penalties, Financial Times p7, 14/8/08) , amount to phoenixing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the apparent problems the ATO is having with James Hardy (+/- $230m in outstanding taxes and penalties, Financial Times p7, 14/8/08) , amount to phoenixing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/18/phoenix-companies-a-lurk-on-the-rise/#comment-20963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20963</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t comment on how widespread this practice has been but a number of charities were caught or nearly caught by something similar in the 1990s. Individuals in a printing company we were about to use apparently had a history of taking on &#039;charity&#039; jobs, raising funds for printing and distribution, delaying output or printing in a low cost way and then collapsing with all funds having been used in high cost transactions for rent and services. One of the serially involved parties was a lawyer who wrote threatening dire legal consequences for any comment on what had happened.  Administrative staff at Non profits were not experienced, publicity shy and intimidated. We considered ourselves very fortunate, withdrawing from an arrangement and then finding out quietly about the practice once the threats started but shocked that people could be associated with the practice time and again without apparent sanction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t comment on how widespread this practice has been but a number of charities were caught or nearly caught by something similar in the 1990s. Individuals in a printing company we were about to use apparently had a history of taking on &#8216;charity&#8217; jobs, raising funds for printing and distribution, delaying output or printing in a low cost way and then collapsing with all funds having been used in high cost transactions for rent and services. One of the serially involved parties was a lawyer who wrote threatening dire legal consequences for any comment on what had happened.  Administrative staff at Non profits were not experienced, publicity shy and intimidated. We considered ourselves very fortunate, withdrawing from an arrangement and then finding out quietly about the practice once the threats started but shocked that people could be associated with the practice time and again without apparent sanction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 498/508 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 10:18:37 -->
