A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
RBA changing its focus from inflation to stagnation
|
The Reserve Bank now sees slowing domestic economic growth and the slowing world economy as risks of the same weighting to our current high inflation rate. As a result, Australia remains on track for a cut in official interest rates next month after the Reserve Bank issued its third Monetary Policy Statement of the year, signalling that it is now more concerned about the slump in economic growth and its impact on a slowing local economy. For the first time this year, the central bank says it is now committed to “sustainable economic growth” as well as the medium term inflation target of 2%-3%. That was after warning in the two previous quarterly statements of the need to either tighten monetary policy, or maintain it to make sure inflation slows. Sustainable economic growth and price stability are the two main policy objectives of the RBA, but since February controlling soaring inflation has been its main one via two interest rates to add to the two in November and August 2007. On top of that we had 0.50% or more in rate rises from the bank, plus higher oil prices, all of which have combined to trigger a rapid slowdown in domestic demand. It is quite a significant signal to the market and is a clear sign the RBA sees the rapidity of the slowdown in domestic economic activity is doing its work and will slow inflation from next year onwards. That’s even though it admits inflation will rise in the September and December quarters, where it could hit the 5% level.
An estimate of 5% inflation from the RBA would normally see markets pricing in another rate rise and pushing the Aussie dollar higher towards parity with the US currency. But not now. The sharp drop in private credit in recent months — as well as retail sales, consumer confidence, home loans and building approvals — is why the bank is signalling madly that a rate cut is coming. And I’d be punting on a drop of 0.50% or one of 0.25% next month and another in October because of something else the RBA said. The bank seems to be more worried about what a further downturn in the world economy would do to Australia, more worried than the impact of the higher inflation rate.
That’s the first time the central bank has been so explicit on the dangers from the very volatile world economy and credit markets and it appears to be setting up a pre-emptive rate cut or two (as Mr Stevens has suggested in the past it has done with rate rises) to give the economy room to handle any worsening in the global economy. While many economists had expected big changes to its forecasts, there was very little. Like the May statement, the bank still thinks inflation will fall to 2.75% by the end of 2010 with economic growth running around the same rate, as well as non-farm growth. The bank repeated the new mantra contained in last week’s statement from Governor Glenn Stevens that: “On the assumption that the subdued demand conditions are likely to continue, scope to move to a less restrictive monetary policy stance in the period ahead is increasing.” It continued:
That last statement was added to the main statement in the document for the first time this year and sends a signal that the bank now is juggling “sustainable economic growth” as well as inflation in some time. This is what it said at the end of the May statement:
In fact it’s a complete switch in policy from May’s concentration solely on inflation. |
|
|
|














3 Comments
I’m no economist but was it not obvious that this is the path we were headed down? The poor share and housing market have led to a staggering loss of wealth in this country. Now we will let another engineered recession finish the job off.
Being untrained I find it hard to understand how the commonsense signals in the economy could be overruled by theory. It is harder to find a blunter instrument than interest rates to achieve control of inflation. Its is also harder to find one that has a greater impact on those that can least afford it.
(Discloser: I have no mortgage so I’m off to buy my third plasma. Hope the guy down the road with the 4 kids and $500,000 mortgage doesn’t mind not being able to afford steak tonight!).
How many times musty we repeat the mistakes before we learn?
How many recessions will we allow central banks to inflict on us with their delusional myth of managing the economy and managing the statistics before we asy “no more”?
World commodity prices rise, the statistics merely reflect the reality, so where is the logic in saying let us punish the people with debts and mortgages by raising interest rates in pursuit of irrelevent and nebulous statistics?
They did it in the 70s, 80s, 90s and now again.
What was achieved by those recessions except for misery and life long setbacks for people at the sharp end of the economic pain? Nothing.
House prices are much higher today than in the 70s, or 80s or 90s, as is the cost of most things meaning prices rose even after we copped our recessions we had to have.
So what was it for except justifiying public largesse be thrown at a bunch of idiotic bureaucrats who are still living in a socialist central planning fanatsy that they can pull leavers and everything will fit thewir models.
The idea of central bank intrerest rate controls is the last regulated socialist bastion yet to be dismantled and sooner it happens, the better. At least we may then avoid political recessions in the future.
The real problem is neither inflation or stagnation in isolation, but both in combination, i.e. ‘stagflation’. There is nothing the RBA can do about this, but at least they could have the honesty to admit they can’t do anything about it.