The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.
Tips and rumours
|
WYD supporter, Kath Day-Knight meet Pope. It’s good to know that the Pope had time in his busy schedule to meet with his higher profile fans:
A major report to the Victorian Government appears to borrow (word-for-word) commentary from an amateur source on the internet. You will know that a major news issue in Melbourne at the moment concerns proposed road and rail tunnels recommended by the Eddington Report. Over 2000 responses to a consultation have been received. The report may have lifted (word-for-word) information from a rail enthusiasts website without acknowledgement: Chapter three of the Eddington report contains commentary on “What other cities are doing”. The commentary for Madrid, Buenos Aires and Shanghai appears to have lifted, word for word, from here, here and here. This is not cited in the Eddingon report’s references. If this is the case, it validifies the lack of respect that many appear to have in the document. The report was commissioned by John Brumby and proposed multi-billion dollar projects. That it may have lifted part of its response from the internet devalues its integrity. Mark Vaile’s ministerial staff are spitting chips today after reading his press release which thanks his electorate staff but not them. This comes on top of him failing to tell any of them after the election defeat that he was resigning as leader and the first they heard of it was as he gave his press conference. Many of them hold some pretty damaging secrets so it will be interesting to see what comes to light over the next few weeks following this latest slap in the face… Did you see Sol Trujillo receiving communion from the Pope on Saturday at St. Marys? Live on Sky! Moving from a collective agreement to an AWA is a significant financial decision. If a Telstra Manager obtains a financial benefit from persuading an employee to move from a collective agreement to an AWA could this be construed as offering financial advice? If so, would there be an obligation on the Telstra Manager to disclose the remuneration arising out of or in relation to the provision of the financial advice? How about opening this question up for Senior Counsel comment. Whilst one could take issue with News on many fronts, they are trying to do something with One Degree to the extent that they are now trying to utilise hybrid hire cars in place of taxis whenever they can. The sticking point? Journos who’d rather pocket a cabcharge docket than make a carbon-neutral contribution by using one of the increasing fleet of silver Prius’ loitering in the carpark outside the main doors. But maybe it’s a convoluted political protest? Green Tomato Cars, the hybrid hirers in question, is the latest project of John Calvert-Jones — Rupe’s brother-in-law and former Federal Treasurer of the Liberal Party. So maybe the journos reluctance to get with the program is an attempt to hurt the extended Murdoch clan or to punish Calvert-Jones for being a Lib? Hold on, this is News. Surely neither possibility is credible. Is it? Regarding the ABC’s John Cameron’s travels to Singapore — since when is tax payers money used for travel and accommodation to Singapore for an off-duty employee (i.e. during a period of leave, not official duty) sprung on drug charges, not to mention one of the ABC’s legal team as well? Would this be the case for any other ABC employee who was faced with a similar situation. Quite likely not. Quite a bit of consternation within the ABC about this issue and the apparent inequity when it comes to supporting some favoured employees with the use of tax payers money. For most employees of publicly funded organisations, if they were caught in a foreign country, whilst on leave, being involved in drug related activities, it would be their own responsibility to meet the costs of their predicament. Quite a discussion point within the ABC at the moment along with the topic of just how much is the organisation prepared to spend on this one matter. According to the Sunday paper in Adelaide, Natasha Stott Despoja held a black tie dinner in Adelaide on Saturday night. Listed amongst the guests were the ACTU’s Sharon Burrow, the SA Liberal leader Martin Hamilton-Smith, the Greens Bob Brown, former Labor Senator Nick Bolkus and retiring Liberal MP Alexander Downer. Noticeably absent were any Democrat names. Two of her just retired Democrat colleagues, Lyn Allison and Andrew Bartlett, were in Adelaide over the weekend for a Young Democrat conference, so one can assume they just weren’t invited. Indeed, Natasha was noticeably absent from the entire Young Democrat event, as well as from the announcement of the party’s candidate for the by-election in Mayo which her party guest Alexander Downer is vacating. I noticed that Channel Seven didn’t start Private Practise — a Grey’s Anatomy spin-off, that hasn’t had the success of it’s parent program — until 8.40pm on Sunday night, after Battle of the Choirs. The cynic in me might suggest that they were deliberately starting it late so that viewers wouldn’t flick over to Rove on Ten — both shows have the same target audience demographic. Similar fight to the “who can start the news the earliest” between Channel Seven and Nine at 5am, every week day. |
|
|
|














9 Comments
It’s well documented that N Spot Destroyer is not well like among her colleagues - info such as the story given above is not surprising.
I dunno about Denton but his wife is a product of the Divine for sure!
What gives with this rush of ABC heavies to Singapore to see their employee sprung for drug offences while on leave? And featuring FA Minister’s comments about the chap, and frequent coverage in news programs. Quite a lot of questions being asked in street chatter about this apparent ABC partiality for one of the in-group, and use of publically funded air and staff time and money, for what seems a decidedly non-spectacular matter. Is there a lapse of management judgment here? Or are we soon to be amazed by a startling revelation of a miscarriage of justice?
JamesK - if you knew John Denton you would realise the scoop is that, for once, Denton is admitting that there is a higher power in the room than him!
Validifies??? Surely the word is VALIDATES.
That George Pell is such a card! Isn’t he?
What on earth does “validifies” mean?
wrt: WYD supporter, Kath Day-Knight meet Pope.
Wow! What a ‘scoop’ for Crikey!
You guy! You are a band of fearless and honest reporters seeking truth and justice in the public interest through hard work…….
If the ‘Corrs blessed by Pope Benedict’ tip is true ( for such is the nature of Tips & Rumours…) then it is a bit of a scoop. It’s shameful that George Pell said today that the Pope could not meet all victims of sexual abuse by priests to apologise yet he makes time to meet and thank the law firm that sends out letters on behalf of the Catholic Church of Australia to (alleged) sexual abuse victims offering money for silence. Noice! This 60 Minutes report transcript extract from June 2002 is very interesting:
http://www.multiline.com.au/~johnm/ethics/lossfaith2.htm
RICHARD CARLETON: And you offered them $50,000.
GEORGE PELL: I offered them nothing. They were free to go into a process which is run by an independent panel.
RICHARD CARLETON: I have a letter here.
GEORGE PELL: That’s from the lawyers after they’d been through the process which they were free to enter.
RICHARD CARLETON: You’re exactly right, sir. It is from the lawyers — Corrs Chambers Westgarth.
GEORGE PELL: That’s right.
RICHARD CARLETON: “Dear Mr and Mrs” — I won’t mention the family name — “as you know, we act for Archbishop Pell.” You offered them 50 grand to be quiet.
GEORGE PELL: I offered them 50 grand in compensation according to the publicly acknowledged procedures.
RICHARD CARLETON: And to be quiet.
GEORGE PELL: And they chose not to accept that.
RICHARD CARLETON: The words, if words have meaning, sir, you bought their silence or you sought to buy their silence — “a realistic alternative to litigation that will otherwise be strenuously defended”.
GEORGE PELL: Yes, if they want to go law, we will use the law to defend ourselves. And they are free to do so.
RICHARD CARLETON: And you swear them to secrecy.
GEORGE PELL: We ask them to…
RICHARD CARLETON: You swear them. You don’t ask them, you swear them.
GEORGE PELL: There is a requirement that they don’t talk about it. Most of them are happy not to. And if they don’t want to use that, they can do something else.
RICHARD CARLETON: They can go to the courts.
GEORGE PELL: Yes.
RICHARD CARLETON: Why do you impose this condition, sir?
GEORGE PELL: Because many of them don’t want to be subjected to publicity and of course it’s shameful for the Church.
RICHARD CARLETON: Archbishop, thank you.
GEORGE PELL: Good, thank you.