Wall St was down 94 overnight, its biggest fall in a month, while the local market is down 66.
Catholics, s-x and other major events
|
World Youth Day continued to attract bad publicity over the weekend, with parish priests bagging it, the event’s official guide to s-x being mocked and George Pell — a man who must awaken every day ruing that it isn’t the fifteenth century — showing how classy the event is by officially launching its taxpayer-subsidised merchandising activities in Sydney’s Hyde Park. The Official WYD Pilgrim Guide’s views on s-x presumably reflect an awareness even on the part of the sinister old men who run the Catholic Church that bringing together thousands of young people guarantees that they’ll rut like bunnies. Happily, the Church has been made so self-conscious of its censoriousness about s-x that it has to carefully phrase its abstinence warnings in order not to look even more medieval than it already does. So the guide’s big on genital warts, but also declares that the Church REALLY, truly, definitely doesn’t have a problem with s-x. “What you may not know,” declares the guide, “is that the Church is actually really positive about s-x. The Church thinks s-x is great … s-x really is awesome!” Which, of course, begs the question, how would a bunch of celibates know what s-x is like? The closest the Catholic hierarchy comes to s-x is when they shelter protectors of child molesters in the Vatican. Catholicism isn’t the only strange belief system featuring in the media at the moment. Apparently Melbourne will get to keep its F1 race a few more years. The World Youth Day is merely one more symptom of the obsession with “major events”, another function of modern politics. The obsession with attracting “major events” first emerged in the 1990s, aided by the success of Brisbane’s Expo in 1988, which not merely attracted vast crowds but was held to have initiated Brisbane’s transformation into a modern capital. Jeff Kennett pursued events enthusiastically as part of a plan to impose attractiveness on Melbourne by force. Labor’s newly-elected Bob Carr, eager to match his Victorian rival, then began a fierce rivalry to attract events — having inherited the Olympics from John Fahey. In time, particularly in NSW and in Canberra under Kate Carnell, major events became a substitute for effective planning and policy. For Governments focussed on media management rather than genuine and difficult reform, hosting events was a convenient distraction. And they came with their own rituals and emblems. Courtesy of magical multipliers based on heroic assumptions about flow-on benefits, the income from events was calculated in the hundreds of millions, for what was invariably an initial small outlay by governments. The extent of the commitment of taxpayer funds was kept secret for as long as possible, frequently on the basis that it was commercially confidential. Governments were always willing to suspend normal processes and override the normal rights of citizens to facilitate the needs and wants of event participants. And any critics were howled down as naysayers, killjoys and small-minded types who wanted to prevent their home from becoming “a genuine world city”. The reality is always a little more prosaic. The commitment of taxpayer funds inevitably rises significantly. The economic benefits turn out to be wildly overstated. Hotel rooms go unoccupied; businesses find themselves unable to open or attract custom due to security measures; attendance numbers are well below expectations and need padding with freebies. Elaborate protective measures turn out to be laughably flawed. And, always, the killer line would be delivered — governments have signed up to lengthy, unbreakable contracts, out-negotiated by the Bernie Ecclestones of the world. One government saw the light — the new Labor ACT Government, finding a city littered with unused futsal slabs and stadium turf painted green, paid out its V8 Supercar contract rather than waste more money on it. Other Governments, however, remain more in thrall to the lure of major events than ever. The hopeless Iemma Government, in particular, lurches from one event to another, each time introducing further and more draconian security laws to curb protests, apparently hoping that a brief influx of taxpayer-subsidised visitors will distract citizens from its inability to run a transport, education or health system. Strangely enough, it is things like a decent public transport system, a functioning health system and a strong school system that play a far bigger role in whether a city is an appealing and dynamic place to live — not stunts and events. At least the Catholic Church now feel self-conscious about its obsession with s-x. If only our state governments could be shamed into admitting their obsession with major events. |
|
|
|














8 Comments
I can understand why Honi Soit rejected it Bernard. The Marxists had some standards. It always amazes me how the Left-liberals lament child molestation why loudly proclaiming the artistic virtues of nude 6 year olds and happily proclaiming the “right ” to butcher unborn children.
It’s good to see anti-Catholic prejudice alive and well in Canberra. Does your correspondent also produce the Jesus-related material in the cartoons? Does he also so vehemently mock Buddhism, Shinto, Marxism, global-warming and other faith-related absurd systems of belief that have no rational basis like what his belief system has? What a happy little correspondent he must be! Venom is GOOD for all of us, obviously. On no account should anybody do anything that they might enjoy or make a living from unless they clear it with him.
Bernard, just write the article without the prejudice. The true thrust of your article - the stupidty of chasing “major events” - is worth reading.
I don’t know how old Bernard Keane is but he writes like someone who learned his trade on Sydney University student magazine Honi Soit in the 1960s. He has lots to offer - why spoil it with juvenile remarks about Catholicism and sex?
MPA Moran, everything I ever sent to Honi Soit was rejected…
Bernard, Bernard: Have you gone soft on Catholicism? Calling them medieval. If you had said stone-aged I could have agreed with you.
I wondered if they would allow the sale of condoms at this Catholic Gymkhana? I can almost see the dead moths fluttering in all those cassocks as the good padres feverishly cross themselves before hiking up their nighties and dreaming of *oys with b*ttoms like peaches. I think a suitable logo for these condoms would be “God is coming”. The Catholic masses are so stupid they would probably believe it.
As a tax-payer I’ll bet no one was asked if they wanted their money to be spent on this huge Catholic jamboree. As for Stephen Williams, good salt-of-the-earth Catholic that he is; I don’t mind the holy romans, or indeed any religion (this includes footy, Formula One, the quaint and dated concept of the Commonwealth Games, drag-racing for dragsters, any other religion at all, making a profit. However, as the tax-payer funded it , the same tax-payer should get first cut of the cloth. First take of the takers?
Don’t forget the poor bl*ody tax-payer will be the ones supporting all the single mums and squalling babies in ten months time.
BTW I see that his obscene holiness, the pope, wants a sort of religious forum to deal with world poverty. The next bit is for you Stephen. Instead of once again wanting to soak the world’s tax-payers to throw our good money after bad money. His holiness would be advised to sell off some gold chausibles and Caraveggios and distribute the obscene wealth of the Church to the needy. London-to-a-brick on, they’ll nearly all be Catholics who need the help.
Another BTW: If Stephen thinks all of Australia’s Catholics support this Roman Circus, he is very misinformed.
Bread and circuses. Easier for the inept state governments to organise than a functional infrastructure.
This article makes no mention of the old Adelaide F1 event, dating back to 1985, which I’m pretty sure was on the receiving end of similar largesse. Personally, if Governments want to throw a bit of cash at an event which generates a substantial amount of economic activity, I don’t regard that as disastrous. What offended me so greatly about this case wasn’t the use of public land or sponsorship of the event, it was the ‘Thou shalt not offend’ laws. Arrest the Pope, I say.