Comments on: A single national insurer? Sounds like healthy policy http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:16:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Connor Moran http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/#comment-20310 Connor Moran Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-20310 No private profit from medicine should be the starting point. No private profit from medicine should be the starting point.

]]> By: Jean http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/#comment-20311 Jean Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-20311 Ian,<br />Sensible, cost effective, simplified health policy - that's why it won't get up! Again there are too many vested interests in keeping the current expensive inefficient system - hence the hysteria about increasing the level at which we have to pay the ridiculous health insurance levy. Ian,
Sensible, cost effective, simplified health policy - that’s why it won’t get up! Again there are too many vested interests in keeping the current expensive inefficient system - hence the hysteria about increasing the level at which we have to pay the ridiculous health insurance levy.

]]> By: Nic http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/#comment-20312 Nic Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-20312 "Does a single insurer imply "socialised medicine"?"<br /><br />Yes, yes it does. “Does a single insurer imply “socialised medicine”?”

Yes, yes it does.

]]>