Garuda crash: time to ask more questions
|
How did the Australian Transport Safety Bureau office in Jakarta fail to discover that Yogyakarta Airport was in breach of safety standards at the time of the Garuda crash on 7 March 2007 in which 21 people were killed, including five Australians? There’s increasing pressure on the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government to explain the ATSB’s incompetence in this matter. Yesterday, Colin Weir, the CEO of Flight Safety Pty Ltd, revealed exclusively to Crikey that insurance claims and legal entitlements of Australian victims of the crash had been compromised by the suppression of information that the airport had failed to act on safety enforcement conditions set prior to the crash, making it effectively unlicensed. On ABC radio’s PM program last night, Caroline Mellish, the sister of AFR Jakarta correspondent Morgan Mellish who died in the disaster, said she didn’t know the illegal status of the airport when she signed off on compensation from Garuda. But the ATSB office in Jakarta should have known, and screwed up so badly that questions remain unanswered as to what Australia is achieving for its money in the corrupt and festering travesty that is the administration of civil aviation in Indonesia. Late yesterday the following statement was made by a spokesperson for the Department of Infrastructure, which is responsible for the ATSB and related air transport matters:
Weir, who audits aviation safety for clients who send employees abroad, slammed the response as a smokescreen:
Weir said a follow-up audit at Yogyakarta showed that contrary to official claims of remedial action nothing had been done, other than put a gate in a fence to allow faster access to the end of the runway where the jet, which was landed at twice the correct speed, tore through a field, over a ditch and into a dirt embankment. |
|
|
|








2 Comments
Mike, The ATSB not only assists Indonesia in air crash investigations (and is acknowledged as doing so to the highest standards) but acts for ICAO in some matters as referred to in yesterday’s story.
Why should the the *Australian* Transport Safety Bureau be in any way responsible for *Indonesian* air safety, or lack of it? (what I mean is why were they even doing an audit?)