WA gas worker: Fark, we ran for our lives

In the wake of the 3 June gas explosion at WA’s Varanus Island, the flow-on effects of which Prime Minister Kevin Rudd warns could be felt across Australia, Crikey has received two illuminating insider accounts of the energy situation in WA (pics included!).

An anonymous Western Australian gas worker writes:

How did the big bang occur last week? The pipe that feeds Western Australia burst due to it corroding down to the thickness of a match stick (as the pictures below show).

Too much pressure, too many idiots, and money, money, money — it could have been prevented!

We had 166 people on the island, and lucky enough not one was injured. But fark, we ran for our lives as it was really, really, really scary.

It does not feel good to be back here so soon (five days later) and the place is quiet — there’s no noise, nothing. Just us hitting spanners etc.

The bl-ody tossers. This could of been prevented if they inspected the pipe like they should do. I hope the state of WA sues these seppos (Apache is an American company) a-ses off.

I’m not sure if I really wanna be here when it’s up and running again (which will be months away) as there is a lot of damage.

Here are some pictures of the area:

 After the explosion  

 The damaged pipes 

 A piece of pipe  

  The corroded pipe

Meanwhile, Crikey received this anonymous tip today:

With the gas crisis starting to seriously impact on WA, it reminds me of how other critical infrastructure services are being maintained in WA. As this gas example shows, it only takes catastrophic failure of one piece of equipment to severely disrupt the nation’s economy and endanger people’s lives.

About five years ago, someone realised that several heat exchangers were not designed for their operating conditions on several of the units at the BP Refinery in Kwinana. Some work was done to check the compliance of about 40 heat exchangers. About 90% of those that were investigated did not meet the pressure vessel code for some reason or other. Several of these contain fluids that are above autoignition temperature during normal operation (ie they will catch on fire if the heat exchanger leaks and the oil is exposed to air).

There have also been several reported cases of these heat exchangers leaking during start up resulting in flames ‘licking’ along the joints as the oil oozes out. Standard practice in these situations is to tighten the bolts with a bigger spanner — not exactly the professional sort of response that I’d expect from a responsible company. There is also a well documented history of internal components in several of these exchangers failing in service.

Despite this issue being highlighted with senior safety staff, senior mechanical engineers and senior operations staff; the few short term mitigation steps that were recommended took over a year to be implemented for the worst offenders and not at all for most heat exchangers. A current global capital shortage within BP has resulted in nearly all long term improvements being deferred until more money is available.

The questions that I think would be worth asking BP are:

  • Are there any heat exchangers at the Kwinana Refinery that do not meet Australian Standards?
  • How long has BP known about this?
  • What work has been done to determine the possible consequences of failure and what are these possible consequences?
  • What mitigation measures have been put in place? How long did it take to implement these measures after the risks were identified?
  • What fraction of the heat exchangers investigated didn’t meet the applicable safety standards?
  • What has BP done to determine that there aren’t other exchangers on the refinery that also fail these codes?
  • How has BP guaranteed that these exchangers do not pose a risk personal safety and the supply of petroleum products to WA?

9 Comments

  1. JamesK
    Posted Friday, 20 June 2008 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Connor, it’s occasionally as entertaining but not quite in the same way

  2. Dr Harvey M Tarvydas #2
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    Well Maybenot that’s how its done. The truth about some deadly reality is too complex to understand but misleading pseudo-scientific rubbish can sound so logical and right it is sold as best practice. Not all. Just sometimes. Thereby the worry. Like if one car in 10,000 got licensed regardless of No brakes, No steering wheel, Hey, cars we all understand. I am talking about UN-recognized bad practices. When we get rid of careless knowingly committed bad practice we should move on to the HARD stuff, more dangerous unrecognized

  3. andrew
    Posted Friday, 20 June 2008 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Dr Harvey, do you have a point?

  4. Dr Harvey M Tarvydas
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    I work in an eclectic collection of science based pursuits, medicine, microbiology, chemistry and engineering. Various Australian Standards cross-relate as science is cross pollinated amongst my endeavours in these areas and I see the most worrying science defying contradictions meandering unrecognised like terrorists in disguise around the playing fields which enjoy a regular killing cull of human subjects quietly explained away with some silly would be ‘science’. Don’t be alarmed that human’s (even clever ones) do stupid things and some of them become enshrined as ‘best practice’.

  5. bill
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    We’ll get the message one day. The oil, coal and gas suits rule. The corporation overrides everything. It’s there for the shareholders, not the people of WA. Bring on the litigation and sort it out.

  6. Connor Moran
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Trying to understand a Tarvydas comment is sometimes like trying to find sense in one of Terry Gilliam’s “stream of consciousness”.

  7. maybenot
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    What are you talking about?

  8. don scott
    Posted Friday, 20 June 2008 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    And Atlas shrugged, for the meek - read weak, dull, ignorant, superstitious, opportunistic and lazy - shall inherit the earth. The meek love bureaucracy, for as a system of organisation it mirrors that of religion, the single greatest terrorist organisation ever. And if ever a working model existed for reasoned men to see clearly the evil that bureaucracy is, look no further than the soviet socialist bureaucracy of australia and the fact that even in the midst of unprecedented economic opportunities this relatively small but massively governed bureaucratic island nation can’t even ensure the most basic of its most important means of production.

  9. RJG
    Posted Thursday, 19 June 2008 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    Good to see the Director of Energy Safety at WA is on the job. Who audited the company’s safety plans and plant integrity test results? Have they resigned yet? Has anybody reported the incident to the Director of Energy Safety or did he/she read about it in the papers? By the way the way pipe stress is a simple function of the pressure in the pipe, the pipe diameter and the pipe thickness. The cost of an ultrasonic thickness tester is about $500 and is usable by virtually anyone, with the exception of lawyers who would be worried about the liability and accountants who would see the cost as a burden on company profits. Perhaps we could all chip in and buy one for them.