Rudd government’s report card on the intervention
|
Yesterday the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) sent out a press release detailing “some of the positive outcomes that have been reported so far.” They included:
Crikey has obtained a copy of the full Ministerial Council for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs Work Plan for 2008/2009, including an NT Intervention situation report week ending 6 June (read full document here). It paints a picture of progress in rolling out health checks to children, and provides a full list of the ‘09 budget allocation and how it applies to the Intervention. The report states:
The Rudd Government has pledged to re-implement the permit system and has begun re-introducing CDEP, and yesterday’s report card shows that while only 4630 children in 58 per cent of all communities had been visited and given health checks at the time the government changed hands in November, that figure reached 11,000 this month. While the progress looks impressive, it must be acknowledged that many of the programs cited in the report had not begun by November. And some figures suggest that while more children have been checked, the rate of coverage has not improved substantially, and is still running at around two thirds of children. “My argument would be that implementing programs takes time and all we’re seeing is the normal lead time to ensure due process in delivery of services. But my qualifier would be if this is … truly a national emergency then we have to roll this out more quickly,” Jon Altman from the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the ANU told Crikey. “Given the appalling historical record, there’s no question they [the Rudd Government] have fast tracked the provision of basic services to indigenous people — but if they’re truly serious about tackling indigenous disadvantage, they have to look at key issues of collaboration and giving indigenous communities control and autonomy,” says Altman. The Rudd government “must also look at the key issue of human rights,” says Altman, and the Intervention’s initial premise that Indigenous Australians must give those rights up just to be entitled to the basic infrastructure and services that are provided to all other Australians. |
|
|
|








One Comment
After reading this article I was was left with the taste in my mouth of ” How much, is NOT quite enough.’ They stuck Oscar Wilde in prison for his association with ‘Paperboys’ and for the ‘Love that dare not speak it’s name.’ These days and in this continent, ‘We simply dare not speak of our Shame.’ Name it Juxtaposition or Dichotomy, but NEVER Symbiosis. The people who ‘Belong to the Earth’ are still dictated to- by the ‘Spiders’ who insist that they actually ‘OWN’ it- and have bits of paper to PROVE this ‘FACT.’
This Country was THEIR’S- and WE took from them on the legal premise- ‘That THEY simply did not EXIST- and therefore- No CRIME had been committed.’
Hands up- all those who reckon that there is no such thing as an Australian Aboriginal. Now hands up- all those people who think a half million dollars is a fair price to pay for a Tennis Court sized CHUNK- of this ‘UN inhabited’ land.
I DON’T SEE ANY HANDS?