<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crikey Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/11/crikey-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/11/crikey-says/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil K</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/11/crikey-says/#comment-7246</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7246</guid>
		<description>Ummm, interesting article and seems to be taken from a position of someone who doesn&#039;t have their child in care. I&#039;m not saying that ABC is a saint, but they only represent 10% of the total childcare market and 30% of the long term day care. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The experience that I have seen is far greater wastage of time, money and resources in the community base or smaller child care operators. The main reason for ABC&#039;s success has been about bring a consistent level of care to all centres they manage and managing that across a number of centres. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the end of the day, people want affordable child care that is accessible. Private vs Public, the cost to government of taking over all childcare would be far higher than having a private sector. Fundamentally, the private sector is about delivering profit, typically by reducing or gaining cost efficiencies.  Public sector Chifleyite view would be about delivering service regardless of the cost. The question is can we as a nation afford to fund publicly childcare to a level far greater than the 1.6 billions today or use that money elsewhere?  To address social equally that make people work extra jobs to support a basic life and having to view child care as a necessity to achieve that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, interesting article and seems to be taken from a position of someone who doesn&#8217;t have their child in care. I&#8217;m not saying that ABC is a saint, but they only represent 10% of the total childcare market and 30% of the long term day care. </p>
<p>The experience that I have seen is far greater wastage of time, money and resources in the community base or smaller child care operators. The main reason for ABC&#8217;s success has been about bring a consistent level of care to all centres they manage and managing that across a number of centres. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, people want affordable child care that is accessible. Private vs Public, the cost to government of taking over all childcare would be far higher than having a private sector. Fundamentally, the private sector is about delivering profit, typically by reducing or gaining cost efficiencies.  Public sector Chifleyite view would be about delivering service regardless of the cost. The question is can we as a nation afford to fund publicly childcare to a level far greater than the 1.6 billions today or use that money elsewhere?  To address social equally that make people work extra jobs to support a basic life and having to view child care as a necessity to achieve that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Moran</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/11/crikey-says/#comment-7247</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7247</guid>
		<description>A vast improvement from yesterday&#039;s effort. More please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vast improvement from yesterday&#8217;s effort. More please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hancock</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/11/crikey-says/#comment-7248</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7248</guid>
		<description>Good on you Crikey....it is well past time profit-taking was removed from this absolutely crucial aspect of life in Australia. Perhaps recessions and good sense go together? Lets hope so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you Crikey&#8230;.it is well past time profit-taking was removed from this absolutely crucial aspect of life in Australia. Perhaps recessions and good sense go together? Lets hope so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 497/507 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 07:55:43 -->
