ABC tells kids: save the planet or DIE
|
Children of the 80s were taught to fear AIDS. The anxiety was neatly stoked by an ad where the grim reaper bowled over human skittles, a ten-pin alley transformed into a version of hell by a creative who left the smoke machine on. Today the fear is environmental armageddon and the ABC has been making sure that kids understand just how grim things are. Their Planet Slayer website has them playing a little game: what age you should die (based on your current carbon consumption and how it impacts the earth)? The game player is represented as a pig. Oink. Ok, so the concept’s a little convoluted, but the death factor is clear. Pity the Charlie Browns of the schoolyard. There’s been some outrage in the media — though clearly muted in comparison with that other ”protect-the-children” controversy. The Herald Sun had the story, with Victorian Senator Mitch Fifield taking the issue to Senate Estimates, enlivening proceedings with his questions to ABC Managing Director Mark Scott:
To which, it seems, Scott was left suppressing giggles. Fifield asked them men whether they thought the site’s depiction of loggers was appropriate:
Mr Scott is looking in to the matter. In the meantime, the site’s still up. Tim Blair has been keenly watching the story put a girdle round about the earth. And it’s been picked up by bloggers internationally, with the issue seeming to gain some momentum, though the wait for Scott’s response has sucked some oxygen from it. (Perhaps if the ABC had put the child player’s pig in a bikini it might have generated a quicker community response?) “I bet you won’t find anything similar even in the children’s workbooks designed by the Nazi propaganda ministry,” writes Leonard , a self-described “Socially Conservative Don Quixote from Moncton”, “yet somehow Australian Broadcasting Corporation (the Auzzie equivalent of the CBC) doesn’t mind hosting the “planet slayer” on its site. The site includes “a calculator apparently intended to show them that they’ve already contributed more than their share of CO2, and that they would do well to go some place quiet and kill themselves. I wish I was kidding,” says The Global Warming Heretic from Texas (where else?) Ok, so many of the commenters are just as easy to stereotype. But even GreenDaily is a bit freaked out. Ellen Slattery wrote yesterday:
The site makes you a pig and sits you between an average Aussie and a “Green Pig”.
We adopted the persona of a gas-guzzling, PC-eschewing hog, responding to questions about air travel and meat eating with inflated answers. And by the end of the questions, here’s how we looked. Oink.
And then, bam, a bacon-makin explosion saw us splattered over the screen. So just how long did we deserve to live? 1.7 years. How precise.
Is it just us or does the Green Pig look really menacing at the end (note the furrowed brow and crinkled snout)? Ah, sweet eco-friendly bias. If you do all the right things, your tiny pig flies up to heaven, says UK site The Register. Who needs religion for fire and brimstone. |
|
|
|








5 Comments
I think the site is great! And in terms of carbon consumption, humans are pigs so what is the problem? This site has been up for around a year anyway, so it is hardly a ‘new insult’. Where has Mitch Fifield been? Under a mossy rock? Or rolling around in his muddy sty perhaps.
I did the pig test many, many months ago, and I was not a big, exploding, blood and guts pig, but neither was I the svelte and slightly angry looking greenie pig. I think that is the whole point - we can all do better. Particularly carbon guzzling, chauffer driven, frequent flier politicians exhaling more than their fair share of CO2 on shallow criticisms such as this. Climate change and Carbon Usage is ugly and scary, particularly for our kids who will have to live with the effects of our rampant consumption. Why sugar coat it? Honesty and openness about our collective problems will hopefully lead to a generation with the guts to make the changes that need to be made - if it’s not already too late.
Awesome site for kids. Let’s watch all the wowsers try and wreck it - especially those PC-enforcing nanny-state hypocrites in the Liberal Party. Kids aren’t dumb (unlike the adults complaining about the site) - let them have their fun.
I like the way that a site aimed at children asks how much of your car use and flying was paid for by work. The question as to electricity use is badly worded - does anyone really know how their energy bill compares to the average?
Brizer: “Let’s watch all the wowsers try and wreck it - especially those PC-enforcing nanny-state hypocrites in the Liberal Party” !!!!!!!!!!!
The only thing hypocritical…..aw forget it.
Hilarious! But way too simplistic to be useful - just a bit of fun for the kids, really! The value is in changing the answers and seeing what happens…