Comments on: Shock. Newspapers reckon newspapers are dynamic and reputable http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/ now with extra source Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:19:42 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: bill http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/#comment-22303 bill Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22303 Newspapers are things I just might read if the real ale at my local is not up to scratch and I need to be distracted with some crap. <br /><br /><br />Otherwise? Never. Crikey services my needs nicely. Newspapers are things I just might read if the real ale at my local is not up to scratch and I need to be distracted with some crap.

Otherwise? Never. Crikey services my needs nicely.

]]> By: Keith Bedford http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/#comment-22304 Keith Bedford Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22304 She would have to be joking. I do not believe anything in the newspapers especially anything in a Murdock paper. No news paper now gives the news as it has occurred. They all give you their spin on the news and you mut apply your own critical facilties to anything that you read. Believe nothing you read and only part of what you see is a good motto. She would have to be joking. I do not believe anything in the newspapers especially anything in a Murdock paper. No news paper now gives the news as it has occurred. They all give you their spin on the news and you mut apply your own critical facilties to anything that you read. Believe nothing you read and only part of what you see is a good motto.

]]> By: seanbedlam http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/#comment-22305 seanbedlam Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22305 "the online reader is nowhere near as involved or engaged"<br /><br /> Too right, KB, that's why none of them post comments on websites. “the online reader is nowhere near as involved or engaged”

Too right, KB, that’s why none of them post comments on websites.

]]> By: KB http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/#comment-22306 KB Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22306 Hey Bill stick to Crikey and your beer....they've both got about the same substance...seriously though you can't be comparing a newspaper to online? There's a conscious decision to buy a newspaper and read it..the online reader is nowhere near as involved or engaged.....give me a paper ( and a whiskey) any day. Hey Bill stick to Crikey and your beer….they’ve both got about the same substance…seriously though you can’t be comparing a newspaper to online? There’s a conscious decision to buy a newspaper and read it..the online reader is nowhere near as involved or engaged…..give me a paper ( and a whiskey) any day.

]]> By: Print Pete http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/shock-newspapers-reckon-newspapers-are-dynamic-and-reputable/#comment-22307 Print Pete Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22307 Keith, a bit of 'grassy knoll' there son? Surely not all news in print is biased? I know we're in the cynical noughties, but sheesh, you've got to trust someone/something occasionally... and I'd much rather trust print than the online my sceptical friend...at least print has some checks and balances, online has none.. Keith, a bit of ‘grassy knoll’ there son? Surely not all news in print is biased? I know we’re in the cynical noughties, but sheesh, you’ve got to trust someone/something occasionally… and I’d much rather trust print than the online my sceptical friend…at least print has some checks and balances, online has none..

]]>