<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mungo: Enter Malcolm, radiating availability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/26/mungo-enter-malcolm-radiating-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/26/mungo-enter-malcolm-radiating-availability/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:39:15 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/26/mungo-enter-malcolm-radiating-availability/#comment-19441</link>
		<dc:creator>nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19441</guid>
		<description>Mungo,

GST is not a tax on only goods and services.  In Australia, it is a tax on &quot;supplies&quot;, a very wide term.  There is not and has never been any controversy about whether calculating GST on the excise inclusive price of petrol is really a tax on a &quot;good&quot; or &quot;service&quot;.  Anyway, even if that was the test, petrol is still a &quot;good&quot;.

Why would it be an act of criminal lunacy to abolish petrol excise?  That makes no sense at all. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mungo,</p>
<p>GST is not a tax on only goods and services.  In Australia, it is a tax on &#8220;supplies&#8221;, a very wide term.  There is not and has never been any controversy about whether calculating GST on the excise inclusive price of petrol is really a tax on a &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;service&#8221;.  Anyway, even if that was the test, petrol is still a &#8220;good&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why would it be an act of criminal lunacy to abolish petrol excise?  That makes no sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK </title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/26/mungo-enter-malcolm-radiating-availability/#comment-19442</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19442</guid>
		<description>MacCallum&#039;s diatribe, particularly the comments in relation to Janet Albrechtsen, is as distasteful as ever.  I will limit my observation to his comments a to &quot;What Rudd should have said..&quot; . MacCallum sounds eerily like an echo of his beloved ex-Prime Minister John Winston Howard. Perhaps Rudd would care to hire JWH as an adviser? Crikey would do well to get rid of this twit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacCallum&#8217;s diatribe, particularly the comments in relation to Janet Albrechtsen, is as distasteful as ever.  I will limit my observation to his comments a to &#8220;What Rudd should have said..&#8221; . MacCallum sounds eerily like an echo of his beloved ex-Prime Minister John Winston Howard. Perhaps Rudd would care to hire JWH as an adviser? Crikey would do well to get rid of this twit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
