<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Telegraph&#8217;s Tour of rooty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/the-daily-telegraphs-tour-of-rooty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/the-daily-telegraphs-tour-of-rooty/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Moran</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/the-daily-telegraphs-tour-of-rooty/#comment-14475</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14475</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t the BIGGER question asked Crikey? Why is it necessary for the Daily Telegraph to publish this highly personal non-story in the first place? They even use the word &quot;unsubstantiated&quot;. Another reason, on top of all the others, as to why I refuse to consume any product connected to News Corporation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t the BIGGER question asked Crikey? Why is it necessary for the Daily Telegraph to publish this highly personal non-story in the first place? They even use the word &#8220;unsubstantiated&#8221;. Another reason, on top of all the others, as to why I refuse to consume any product connected to News Corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike smith</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/the-daily-telegraphs-tour-of-rooty/#comment-14476</link>
		<dc:creator>mike smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14476</guid>
		<description>If soldiers weren&#039;t allowed to fraternise[1] whilst on tour, I think there would be few volunteers.  [1] damn PC words, it&#039;s actually another word starting with f.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If soldiers weren&#8217;t allowed to fraternise[1] whilst on tour, I think there would be few volunteers.  [1] damn PC words, it&#8217;s actually another word starting with f.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embi</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/the-daily-telegraphs-tour-of-rooty/#comment-14477</link>
		<dc:creator>Embi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14477</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Connor.  I couldn&#039;t remember Tania Zaetta but it sounds like she has carved out some sort of career in India where (publicly) there is far less tolerance for (female) celebrities dallying outside their own marital relationship.  This story - true or not - is going to irreparably harm her future employment prospects.  It is almost certain that she was defamed by this story and it has caused significant harm.  Can the Tele argue truth as a defence when they didn&#039;t try and confirm the story with her or anyone else before rushing into print and internet distribution?  Is the confidential briefing document enough - especially in a case where it is hard to argue public interest? This may turn into a very costly story for the Telegraph if Zaetta pursues her legal options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Connor.  I couldn&#8217;t remember Tania Zaetta but it sounds like she has carved out some sort of career in India where (publicly) there is far less tolerance for (female) celebrities dallying outside their own marital relationship.  This story - true or not - is going to irreparably harm her future employment prospects.  It is almost certain that she was defamed by this story and it has caused significant harm.  Can the Tele argue truth as a defence when they didn&#8217;t try and confirm the story with her or anyone else before rushing into print and internet distribution?  Is the confidential briefing document enough - especially in a case where it is hard to argue public interest? This may turn into a very costly story for the Telegraph if Zaetta pursues her legal options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 498/508 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 09:31:11 -->
