<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mungo: Nelson joins the list of Budget losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:05:56 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John James # 3</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22204</link>
		<dc:creator>John James # 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22204</guid>
		<description>Murdering of the innocent is something to get obsessive about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdering of the innocent is something to get obsessive about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John James</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22205</link>
		<dc:creator>John James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22205</guid>
		<description>Kate, you can pick an abortionist a mile away. They never use the language normally used when speaking about the unborn and giving birth. Pregnant women always talk about &quot;my baby&quot;, abortionists talk about &quot;the foetus&#039;, and having the baby becomes, to use Lucy&#039;s term, &quot; spawning&quot;. Anything to dehumanise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate, you can pick an abortionist a mile away. They never use the language normally used when speaking about the unborn and giving birth. Pregnant women always talk about &#8220;my baby&#8221;, abortionists talk about &#8220;the foetus&#8217;, and having the baby becomes, to use Lucy&#8217;s term, &#8221; spawning&#8221;. Anything to dehumanise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22206</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22206</guid>
		<description>How on earth did you manage to make this about abortion, JJ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How on earth did you manage to make this about abortion, JJ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22207</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22207</guid>
		<description>My favourite part of the whole thing was reading the DT&#039;s coverage. Basically, they found a whole bunch of families on $150 000+ to cry poor, in detail, under the banner &quot;FAMILIES LET DOWN BY RUDD&quot; or somesuch. One of them had wanted her baby bonus to pay for a home birth, because god forbid she should do her spawning in a public hospital with all the plebs. Another was saying &quot;it&#039;s not about the money, it&#039;s about the recognition that what I do is important&quot;. What&#039;s wrong with a World&#039;s Best Mum mug?  And all the stories started with &quot;Mark, 35, an advertising account director, and his wife Briony, a stay-at-home mum, make $220 000 between them, but say they don&#039;t feel rich&quot;, as if wealth redistribution should penalise only those who FEEL rich. In aggregate they formed, as someone somewhere once put it, a walking advertisement for a massive luxury goods tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite part of the whole thing was reading the DT&#8217;s coverage. Basically, they found a whole bunch of families on $150 000+ to cry poor, in detail, under the banner &#8220;FAMILIES LET DOWN BY RUDD&#8221; or somesuch. One of them had wanted her baby bonus to pay for a home birth, because god forbid she should do her spawning in a public hospital with all the plebs. Another was saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not about the money, it&#8217;s about the recognition that what I do is important&#8221;. What&#8217;s wrong with a World&#8217;s Best Mum mug?  And all the stories started with &#8220;Mark, 35, an advertising account director, and his wife Briony, a stay-at-home mum, make $220 000 between them, but say they don&#8217;t feel rich&#8221;, as if wealth redistribution should penalise only those who FEEL rich. In aggregate they formed, as someone somewhere once put it, a walking advertisement for a massive luxury goods tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK </title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22208</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22208</guid>
		<description>&quot;John Howard did it when he was in trouble at the beginning of 2001, but wisely resisted pleas for an encore for the next seven years&quot;  There, there Mungo that nasty Mr. Howard is gone. No need to fret that he did something wisely.... He&#039;s gone! I promise!..........................................What d&#039;ya mean you miss him?????
Whilst I may not have put it quite those terms, John James is correct  and that is unfortunate for ordinary Joe (or Lucy) Bloggs .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>John Howard did it when he was in trouble at the beginning of 2001, but wisely resisted pleas for an encore for the next seven years&#8221;  There, there Mungo that nasty Mr. Howard is gone. No need to fret that he did something wisely&#8230;. He&#8217;s gone! I promise!&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;What d&#8217;ya mean you miss him?????<br />
Whilst I may not have put it quite those terms, John James is correct  and that is unfortunate for ordinary Joe (or Lucy) Bloggs .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22209</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22209</guid>
		<description>Mungo, sorry but I have to agree with Peter Johns. The goal posts have moved significantly and largely silently. I have no idea how folks with kids, car, mortgage etc and $150k could possibly be defined as rich. If only it were true! Just to be helpful - my definition of rich is &quot;significantly less out goings than incomings&quot;. Most families on $150k are just holding their own - in Sydney they may not even be doing that! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mungo, sorry but I have to agree with Peter Johns. The goal posts have moved significantly and largely silently. I have no idea how folks with kids, car, mortgage etc and $150k could possibly be defined as rich. If only it were true! Just to be helpful - my definition of rich is &#8220;significantly less out goings than incomings&#8221;. Most families on $150k are just holding their own - in Sydney they may not even be doing that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22210</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22210</guid>
		<description>... and you can pick an obsessive fundamentalist from a mile away too.   They always manage to weasel their pet topic into any conversation, no matter how unrelated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and you can pick an obsessive fundamentalist from a mile away too.   They always manage to weasel their pet topic into any conversation, no matter how unrelated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Johns</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22211</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Johns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22211</guid>
		<description>Poor old Mungo seems to be strungling with his maths....

&#039;They are, however, among the very top earners in Australia, amassing more than 90% of their fellow Australians and considerably more than twice the average. In global terms, of course, they are towards the peak of the top one billionth.&#039;

Wouldn&#039;t the top &#039;one billionth&#039; be,...er...the top 6 or so richest people in the world? even if you reduced it drastically to the &#039;top one thousanth&#039; you&#039;re still only talking 6 million people - which, while undoubtedly including many Australians would hardly include a couple earning $150,000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor old Mungo seems to be strungling with his maths&#8230;.</p>
<p><span class="quo">&#8216;</span>They are, however, among the very top earners in Australia, amassing more than 90% of their fellow Australians and considerably more than twice the average. In global terms, of course, they are towards the peak of the top one billionth.&#8217;</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the top &#8216;one billionth&#8217; be,&#8230;er&#8230;the top 6 or so richest people in the world? even if you reduced it drastically to the &#8216;top one thousanth&#8217; you&#8217;re still only talking 6 million people - which, while undoubtedly including many Australians would hardly include a couple earning $150,000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John James</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/mungo-nelson-joins-the-list-of-budget-losers/#comment-22212</link>
		<dc:creator>John James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22212</guid>
		<description>&quot;..God forbid she should do her spawning in the public hospital with all the plebs&quot; Lucy, I dont know which editions of the DT you&#039;ve been reading but you must have missed the ones describing &quot;spawning &quot; ( interesting term that only an apologist for abortion would use, never a mother actually expecting! ) that has ocurred in the toilets of major teaching hospitas here in Sydney &#039;cause there was no bed.
So Swan&#039;s brilliant move to shift more people to the same hospital is an ominous sign of whats to come. With Roxon ans Swan working together with Iemma,  get set for a wild ride. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;..God forbid she should do her spawning in the public hospital with all the plebs&#8221; Lucy, I dont know which editions of the DT you&#8217;ve been reading but you must have missed the ones describing &#8220;spawning &#8221; ( interesting term that only an apologist for abortion would use, never a mother actually expecting! ) that has ocurred in the toilets of major teaching hospitas here in Sydney &#8216;cause there was no bed.<br />
So Swan&#8217;s brilliant move to shift more people to the same hospital is an ominous sign of whats to come. With Roxon ans Swan working together with Iemma,  get set for a wild ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
