Australia’s refugee problem has attracted global attention. This from the New York Times.
Fairfax freelance deal an “unenforceable” joke
|
It looks like being a lean year for the Fairfax stable of contributor journalists. Apparently tiring of seeing freelance bylines appearing in various titles (a tactic pursued by self-employed writers presumably in the interests of Making A Living), Fairfax has proposed a new contributor agreement, one which severely restricts any writer’s ability to work between Fairfax titles and any other of a pretty comprehensive range of Australian publishers. Do more than three stories in any given six month period for Fairfax, and that money will have to see you through. According to one lawyer in the field, the agreement “is almost nonsensical”, in particular, the section relating to “Other Work” is “a restraint of trade and almost entirely unenforceable”. Then there are the rights to republication also demanded. According to one outraged and soon to be impoverished freelancer: “The gist of it is that Fairfax gets a worldwide irrevocable exclusive licence to reproduce the story (i.e: no restriction on which publication they reproduce it in), the contributor can only licence reproduction of story to a third party outside of Australia and New Zealand.” “Within Australia, we can’t licence a story to a long list of major media organisations, without Fairfax permission, even after it has been published or rejected by Fairfax. (List includes Newscorp, Telstra, PBL, ninemsn, Seven Network, Yahoo, WAN, ACP, APN and Time Inc) and most disturbingly, anyone who writes more than three pieces for a Fairfax publication in SIX months, is not allowed to submit other stories to the same long list of companies in point two.” Here’s the nitty gritty from the document:
You have to wonder just what they expect for $350-per-1000 words. As one multi-title freelancer put it, “the real absurdity is that as everyone knows, the modern newspaper is entirely dependent on the work of freelance writers. They’re cheaper.” It would seem Fairfax is intent on making its cake redundant and then eating it too. The one point of consolation in all of this is that Crikey doesn’t feature on the forbidden publications list. We therefore extend a cordial welcome to all aspiring Fairfax contributors. Send your story proposals to boss@crikey.com.au. |
|
|
|













3 Comments
” most disturbingly, anyone who writes more than three pieces [..] in SIX months, is not allowed to submit other stories[..]”
Any reason I cant find the apparently most disturbing part of the agreement quoted above?
Of course it is only enforceable until someone with enough $$, time and courage decides to have a tilt at that windmill. Now who will conduct that case pro bono…
What are crickey’s rates?