<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email monitoring won&#8217;t prevent terror attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/email-monitoring-wont-prevent-terror-attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/email-monitoring-wont-prevent-terror-attacks/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Rollo</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/email-monitoring-wont-prevent-terror-attacks/#comment-13347</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Rollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13347</guid>
		<description>Not using specific words isn&#039;t the only thing terrorists would do. You could also expect them to start using encryption on their email. This is trivial to do (see http://www.gnupg.org/ to find out how and find helpful guides on doing it yourself). In fact I would be surprised at any terrorist who was sending their operational email in plain text - somebody talking about their top secret plans to undermine a government in clear text over email is too stupid to breathe and deserves to be caught.

Employers should not be intercepting email on their networks (and it is illegal to do so in New South Wales now without giving notice under the Workplace Surveillance Act), but after some of the things in the PATRIOT Act in the United States, and given how much network traffic crosses the United States, it is unrealistic to expect that you can have any privacy in email if you are not encrypting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not using specific words isn&#8217;t the only thing terrorists would do. You could also expect them to start using encryption on their email. This is trivial to do (see <a href="http://www.gnupg.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnupg.org/</a> to find out how and find helpful guides on doing it yourself). In fact I would be surprised at any terrorist who was sending their operational email in plain text - somebody talking about their top secret plans to undermine a government in clear text over email is too stupid to breathe and deserves to be caught.</p>
<p>Employers should not be intercepting email on their networks (and it is illegal to do so in New South Wales now without giving notice under the Workplace Surveillance Act), but after some of the things in the PATRIOT Act in the United States, and given how much network traffic crosses the United States, it is unrealistic to expect that you can have any privacy in email if you are not encrypting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/443 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 13:59:56 -->
