<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are antidepressants the answer for depression?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/are-antidepressants-the-answer-for-depression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/are-antidepressants-the-answer-for-depression/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/16/are-antidepressants-the-answer-for-depression/#comment-13743</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13743</guid>
		<description>I am grateful to have come across this article by Dr. Jureidini (following my reply to Ian Hickie, 21 April) and am relieved to know there are psychiatrists who retain some doubts about the efficacy of pharmacological therapy. Also gladdened by Ian Haywood&#039;s comment below reflecting there exists an appetite among some psychiatrists to receive training in psychological methods. Just a quick story (told with Aussie irony) is that I worked on a suicide crisis line for 2 years and guess what the usual plan was that I had to contract with the caller to STOP &quot;don&#039;t swallow anymore anti-psychotics, anti-depressants and benzodiazepams&quot; for the afternoon/evening and promise to call back if you feel the need to break your agreement.
I was disappointed one morning following a shift to hear Mr. Hickie defend mental health drugs with &quot;do the body count&quot; (i.e., more meds, less deaths) on a current affairs program a year or so ago. Patients/clients NEED people not pills (most of the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am grateful to have come across this article by Dr. Jureidini (following my reply to Ian Hickie, 21 April) and am relieved to know there are psychiatrists who retain some doubts about the efficacy of pharmacological therapy. Also gladdened by Ian Haywood&#8217;s comment below reflecting there exists an appetite among some psychiatrists to receive training in psychological methods. Just a quick story (told with Aussie irony) is that I worked on a suicide crisis line for 2 years and guess what the usual plan was that I had to contract with the caller to STOP &#8220;don&#8217;t swallow anymore anti-psychotics, anti-depressants and benzodiazepams&#8221; for the afternoon/evening and promise to call back if you feel the need to break your agreement.<br />
I was disappointed one morning following a shift to hear Mr. Hickie defend mental health drugs with &#8220;do the body count&#8221; (i.e., more meds, less deaths) on a current affairs program a year or so ago. Patients/clients NEED people not pills (most of the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/443 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 12:34:32 -->
