<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Wankley Award goes to &#8230; Peter Overton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Sams</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Sams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17398</guid>
		<description>Peter Overton should hang his head in shame.   This household does not watch 60 Minutes as it is considered to be sensationalised journalism.  I had to read the article on Monday morning twice to get my head around it.  It is obvious that the father and daughter have something mentally wrong with them.   What is important that Channel 9  misrepresented the real truth.  To leave half the facts out was so wrong and just shows what low levels Channel Nine will stoop to, to try to lift their ratings.  Shame on Overton and anyone else at the Channel that had anything to do with the production of the lust of the Deaves.  The title &quot;Forbidden Love&quot; reminds me of the untruths of the fabrication of the truth by Norma Khouri in her book by the same name, &quot;Forbidden Love&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Overton should hang his head in shame.   This household does not watch 60 Minutes as it is considered to be sensationalised journalism.  I had to read the article on Monday morning twice to get my head around it.  It is obvious that the father and daughter have something mentally wrong with them.   What is important that Channel 9  misrepresented the real truth.  To leave half the facts out was so wrong and just shows what low levels Channel Nine will stoop to, to try to lift their ratings.  Shame on Overton and anyone else at the Channel that had anything to do with the production of the lust of the Deaves.  The title &#8220;Forbidden Love&#8221; reminds me of the untruths of the fabrication of the truth by Norma Khouri in her book by the same name, &#8220;Forbidden Love&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goerge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17399</link>
		<dc:creator>Goerge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17399</guid>
		<description>As long as children with a psyche not fully incapable are absent from the equation, then they should be able to do what they want with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as children with a psyche not fully incapable are absent from the equation, then they should be able to do what they want with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venise Alstergren</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17400</link>
		<dc:creator>Venise Alstergren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17400</guid>
		<description>Trash begets trash. That&#039;s reality. The amount of children each of them have had prior to their incestuous relationship will reach adulthood devoid of any ability to understand some of the basic tenants of life. They are f*cked before they begin, all 6 of them. That these slobish, mental retards and bent crooks  are free to inbreed is frightening. Of course the children will be deformed. This is why such a relationship has been frowned upon throughout history- with the exception of the ancient Egyptian royalty. It isn&#039;t properly a church/moral issue, although the church would have everyone believe it so. It&#039;s just sound genetic sense.
Overton, and Channel 9 appear to have been doing the old chequebook journalism bit. Who got in touch with whom I wonder.? 
Andrew Bolt deserves great credit for his article.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trash begets trash. That&#8217;s reality. The amount of children each of them have had prior to their incestuous relationship will reach adulthood devoid of any ability to understand some of the basic tenants of life. They are f*cked before they begin, all 6 of them. That these slobish, mental retards and bent crooks  are free to inbreed is frightening. Of course the children will be deformed. This is why such a relationship has been frowned upon throughout history- with the exception of the ancient Egyptian royalty. It isn&#8217;t properly a church/moral issue, although the church would have everyone believe it so. It&#8217;s just sound genetic sense.<br />
Overton, and Channel 9 appear to have been doing the old chequebook journalism bit. Who got in touch with whom I wonder.?<br />
Andrew Bolt deserves great credit for his article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesk</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17401</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just the point Goerge! The harm to innocents.......see Andrew Bolt&#039;s critique referred to in Sophie Black&#039;s piece or don&#039;t bother......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just the point Goerge! The harm to innocents&#8230;&#8230;.see Andrew Bolt&#8217;s critique referred to in Sophie Black&#8217;s piece or don&#8217;t bother&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve martin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17402</link>
		<dc:creator>steve martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17402</guid>
		<description>Normally in sex related cases the names of the culprit(s) are not used to protect the innocent. So what I find totally repugnant, apart from the incestuous relationship,is the naming and presumably shaming of the little girl at the center of the case. Admitedly she is an infant; but no doubt there will be plenty prepared to point the finger at her when she is old enough to understand the case.
And we were regailed by psychologists waffling about the likely harm to the psyche of the child, while participating in this exhibition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally in sex related cases the names of the culprit(s) are not used to protect the innocent. So what I find totally repugnant, apart from the incestuous relationship,is the naming and presumably shaming of the little girl at the center of the case. Admitedly she is an infant; but no doubt there will be plenty prepared to point the finger at her when she is old enough to understand the case.<br />
And we were regailed by psychologists waffling about the likely harm to the psyche of the child, while participating in this exhibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17403</guid>
		<description>Peter Overton sucks!!!!

He has to be the worst of all the 60 minute actors &amp; that is something to be ashamed off! Yes I meant to say actor, it is an injustice to all reporters to call him one!

Just watched 60 minutes (which I intend never to watch again) to have Peter discuss the mortgage issue which is being felt in Australia. Instead of investigating the issue, reporting the problem in a factual manner &amp; possibly have a qualified financial person dispense some info on how to address the issue of personal debt. He sensualises the problem, the old routine of parading unfortunate folk in front of the camera &amp; trying to make them cry.

Going to create a Peter Overton hate group!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Overton sucks!!!!</p>
<p>He has to be the worst of all the 60 minute actors &#038; that is something to be ashamed off! Yes I meant to say actor, it is an injustice to all reporters to call him one!</p>
<p>Just watched 60 minutes (which I intend never to watch again) to have Peter discuss the mortgage issue which is being felt in Australia. Instead of investigating the issue, reporting the problem in a factual manner &#038; possibly have a qualified financial person dispense some info on how to address the issue of personal debt. He sensualises the problem, the old routine of parading unfortunate folk in front of the camera &#038; trying to make them cry.</p>
<p>Going to create a Peter Overton hate group!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamesk</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/11/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-peter-overton/#comment-17404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17404</guid>
		<description>The most repugnant of Overton&#039;s many catastrophic miscalculations was interviewing the other children of these two sad incestuous individuals. The most repugnant of 60Mintes is that they ran this pathetic version of &quot;the story&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most repugnant of Overton&#8217;s many catastrophic miscalculations was interviewing the other children of these two sad incestuous individuals. The most repugnant of 60Mintes is that they ran this pathetic version of &#8220;the story&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 625/634 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 11:43:46 -->
