The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.
And the Wankley Award goes to … Peter Overton
|
OK, we confess, when it comes to 60 Minutes‘ repugnant incest couple story, Crikey agrees with Andrew Bolt word for word today. A tip of the hat to The Herald Sun columnist for tearing strips off 60 Minutes reporter Peter Overton. Last Sunday, Peter presented his story ‘Forbidden Love’, opening with what he said looked like “a picture perfect family” who “despite the odds”, were proud parents of a normal healthy baby girl called Celeste. And the odds are stacked against them since they happen to be father and daughter. Who have s-x. Regularly. ”Fantastic” s-x, apparently. We call it incest. Overton called it “Genetic S-xual Attraction”. Packaged like a bad Mills and Boon novel, Overton gave air time to a couple of clearly delusional people, or as he put it — ”when blood relatives fall for each other”.
Hot. This story was already wrong on so many levels, but the revelation the next day that the couple had already had a son before Celeste who died of a congenital heart defect meant that Overton had omitted a key detail as he ran footage of the little family posing for Pixie snaps. Bolt picks apart Overton’s Vaseline lens story of “ordinary folks”, line for line:
As for the missing baby:
Executive producer Hamish Thomson’s admission that the network bought the couple clothes “from Target” and offered them cash (to “help them move” since the neighbourhood of Mount Gambier, who John and Jenny hoped would “accept their relationship”, are more likely to drive them out with flaming stakes) is now under investigation. Nevertheless, Nine scored mountains of publicity. The story knocked the pregnant man off top spot for most read on news.com.au this week. That and a follow up story for this Sunday (on the dead baby we forgot to mention last week) with enough car crash TV potential to rate through the roof. Peter Overton, your heartwarming tale of incest makes you Crikey’s worthy Wankley of the Week. |
|
|
7 Comments
Peter Overton should hang his head in shame. This household does not watch 60 Minutes as it is considered to be sensationalised journalism. I had to read the article on Monday morning twice to get my head around it. It is obvious that the father and daughter have something mentally wrong with them. What is important that Channel 9 misrepresented the real truth. To leave half the facts out was so wrong and just shows what low levels Channel Nine will stoop to, to try to lift their ratings. Shame on Overton and anyone else at the Channel that had anything to do with the production of the lust of the Deaves. The title “Forbidden Love” reminds me of the untruths of the fabrication of the truth by Norma Khouri in her book by the same name, “Forbidden Love”.
As long as children with a psyche not fully incapable are absent from the equation, then they should be able to do what they want with each other.
Trash begets trash. That’s reality. The amount of children each of them have had prior to their incestuous relationship will reach adulthood devoid of any ability to understand some of the basic tenants of life. They are f*cked before they begin, all 6 of them. That these slobish, mental retards and bent crooks are free to inbreed is frightening. Of course the children will be deformed. This is why such a relationship has been frowned upon throughout history- with the exception of the ancient Egyptian royalty. It isn’t properly a church/moral issue, although the church would have everyone believe it so. It’s just sound genetic sense.
Overton, and Channel 9 appear to have been doing the old chequebook journalism bit. Who got in touch with whom I wonder.?
Andrew Bolt deserves great credit for his article.
That’s just the point Goerge! The harm to innocents…….see Andrew Bolt’s critique referred to in Sophie Black’s piece or don’t bother……
Normally in sex related cases the names of the culprit(s) are not used to protect the innocent. So what I find totally repugnant, apart from the incestuous relationship,is the naming and presumably shaming of the little girl at the center of the case. Admitedly she is an infant; but no doubt there will be plenty prepared to point the finger at her when she is old enough to understand the case.
And we were regailed by psychologists waffling about the likely harm to the psyche of the child, while participating in this exhibition.
Peter Overton sucks!!!!
He has to be the worst of all the 60 minute actors & that is something to be ashamed off! Yes I meant to say actor, it is an injustice to all reporters to call him one!
Just watched 60 minutes (which I intend never to watch again) to have Peter discuss the mortgage issue which is being felt in Australia. Instead of investigating the issue, reporting the problem in a factual manner & possibly have a qualified financial person dispense some info on how to address the issue of personal debt. He sensualises the problem, the old routine of parading unfortunate folk in front of the camera & trying to make them cry.
Going to create a Peter Overton hate group!!!
The most repugnant of Overton’s many catastrophic miscalculations was interviewing the other children of these two sad incestuous individuals. The most repugnant of 60Mintes is that they ran this pathetic version of “the story”.