<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plastic fantastic: Bagging the bag baggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9984</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9984</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, Gerard, eggy face. My zeroes were wrong (should have been 12 for UK billion), and I forgot we were talking tonnes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, Gerard, eggy face. My zeroes were wrong (should have been 12 for UK billion), and I forgot we were talking tonnes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Balfour</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9985</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Balfour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9985</guid>
		<description>Easily solved.  The shop charges the customer say .50 cents for each plastic bag and the money goes to environmental organizations e.g. Clean-up Australia,.  Nothing to do with food prices, just &#039;user pays&#039; principle.  Need a plastic bag, you pay for it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily solved.  The shop charges the customer say .50 cents for each plastic bag and the money goes to environmental organizations e.g. Clean-up Australia,.  Nothing to do with food prices, just &#8216;user pays&#8217; principle.  Need a plastic bag, you pay for it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecology action</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9986</link>
		<dc:creator>ecology action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9986</guid>
		<description>Pascoe, Devine et al, make a fair argument but no banana. Landfill itself is failed resource management of especially veg/organic (aka putrescible) waste. Plastic bags low priority after peak oil. First step symbolic rejection of throw away CULTURE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pascoe, Devine et al, make a fair argument but no banana. Landfill itself is failed resource management of especially veg/organic (aka putrescible) waste. Plastic bags low priority after peak oil. First step symbolic rejection of throw away CULTURE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard van Rijswijk</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9987</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard van Rijswijk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9987</guid>
		<description>Who said plastic bags were a pollution issue? No, they should not be in litter - but humans do that.  They are inert in landfill even reducing greenhouse emissions - according to government reports.  If you stop people littering them, where is the problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said plastic bags were a pollution issue? No, they should not be in litter - but humans do that.  They are inert in landfill even reducing greenhouse emissions - according to government reports.  If you stop people littering them, where is the problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9988</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9988</guid>
		<description>Mr Pascoe reflects the approach of the promoters of single use plastic bags; allow us to pollute and let the community pay for the clean up. If he can&#039;t use his &#039;free&#039; bags to pick up his dog&#039;s sh*t leave it for someone else to deal with. Free market sh*t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Pascoe reflects the approach of the promoters of single use plastic bags; allow us to pollute and let the community pay for the clean up. If he can&#8217;t use his &#8216;free&#8217; bags to pick up his dog&#8217;s sh*t leave it for someone else to deal with. Free market sh*t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Moran</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9989</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9989</guid>
		<description>Plastic bags are a complete distraction. What about the multi-millions spent on Pet Food printing and packaging? We should be targetting all forms of unnecessary packaging for elimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plastic bags are a complete distraction. What about the multi-millions spent on Pet Food printing and packaging? We should be targetting all forms of unnecessary packaging for elimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9990</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9990</guid>
		<description>Mr Pascoe seems to have used the US (6 zeroes), not the UK/Oz  (9 zeroes) billion. Using the latter, 5.5 grams per bag is correct - confirmed it by weighing two bags (one normal, one small) on my electronic scale. Total weight: 11g; average: 5.5g.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Pascoe seems to have used the US (6 zeroes), not the UK/Oz  (9 zeroes) billion. Using the latter, 5.5 grams per bag is correct - confirmed it by weighing two bags (one normal, one small) on my electronic scale. Total weight: 11g; average: 5.5g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/20/plastic-fantastic-bagging-the-bag-baggers/#comment-9991</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9991</guid>
		<description>The calculated weight of bags that matches the data given is correct - 5.5Kg.  This suggests that the base number for the weight of 4 billion bags (22 million tonnes) is clearly wrong.  This eceeds the total amount of waste to landfill each year. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The calculated weight of bags that matches the data given is correct - 5.5Kg.  This suggests that the base number for the weight of 4 billion bags (22 million tonnes) is clearly wrong.  This eceeds the total amount of waste to landfill each year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 658/667 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 15:24:49 -->
