Comments on: Reading the fine print on emissions trading

By: Kevin Cox

Kevin Cox — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Guy you are right in your analysis of the situation. The sad fact is that even if people understood the issues there are just too many other ways to circumvent emissions permits. Permits and Carbon trading will not be allowed to work in time.

By: RJG

RJG — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

I’m a bit of a gambler. I just invested $34K on a solar system on the basis that global warming is a serious issue. Government has encouraged me in this by donating $8K. If GW turns out to be a hoax will the Gov’t compensate me as Big Carbon require?

By: Tom McL

Tom McL — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Thanks to you Guy Pearse, and crikey here. It’s not happening, only it is as per the global glaciers report recently. God have mercy on us. NASA’s Dr Hansen on tipping points past 300-350ppm CO2
http://www.columbia.edu/%7Ejeh1/RoyalCollPhyscns_Jan08.pdf

By: John James

John James — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Never mind about the ‘Greenhouse mafia’!The Green mafia with their climate change orthodoxy,arcane ecomic theory, support for population reductions,unwillingness to debate and bizarre technology stances, insisting that wind and solar are credible. Whacko!

By: John James # 2

John James # 2 — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Mandatory reading for the green movement and its apologists, Vaclav Haust’s “Climate Alarmists pose real threat to Freedom”.