<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media briefs and TV ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/19/media-briefs-and-tv-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/19/media-briefs-and-tv-ratings/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davo</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/19/media-briefs-and-tv-ratings/#comment-25537</link>
		<dc:creator>davo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25537</guid>
		<description>For shows like &#039;The Sarah Connor Chronicles&#039; and &#039;Supernatural&#039; - could their poor ratings be due to their on-line availability, and their appeal to a generation who won&#039;t wait, and who can download? They are both excellent genre shows - should rate more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For shows like &#8216;The Sarah Connor Chronicles&#8217; and &#8216;Supernatural&#8217; - could their poor ratings be due to their on-line availability, and their appeal to a generation who won&#8217;t wait, and who can download? They are both excellent genre shows - should rate more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/442 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:36:16 -->
