More questions than answers on Bendigo Bank’s rising share price
|
The ASX asked Bendigo Bank if it knew why its share price rose strongly this week and the bank said “no”. On the face of it that was a perfectly reasonable question and answer. So then later yesterday AAP reports this:
BRED Banque Populaire’s holding is still below the five per cent “substantial shareholder” limit but it is rubbish for Bendigo to say that because the 5% threshold hadn’t been reached there was no disclosure. Last year when Brambles spotted Asciano (and then Toll Holdings) creeping into its share register with less than 2.5% it outed them straight away and kept updating the market on the attempt by the two companies to stalk their larger competitor. If it was good enough for Brambles to disclose a less than 5% shareholding, it is also good enough for Bendigo Bank to disclose the march up its share register by the French bank. Bendigo Bank knew why the share price rose: it just chose not to tell and instead hid behind a legalism. |
|
|
|








One Comment
Why does the ASX Question 1 (Is the Company aware of ANY information concerning it…) not require a straight answer? Having been found out, will the ASX now reprimand/punish personally the signatory “per Company Secretary”?