<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100 days of wonky stunts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:14:11 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garry Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24648</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24648</guid>
		<description>I agree with John Hunwick. This is gratuitously cynical avoiding serious engagement. If the achievements of the past 3 months deserve this response what is the rationale? Are you saying Rudd is im/a -moral? 16 chars left. Is this sound bite journalism? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with John Hunwick. This is gratuitously cynical avoiding serious engagement. If the achievements of the past 3 months deserve this response what is the rationale? Are you saying Rudd is im/a -moral? 16 chars left. Is this sound bite journalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Bedford</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24649</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Bedford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24649</guid>
		<description>After Howard ny thing looks good. Rudd has done many thing to right the Hoard wrongs so lay off and be constructive. You remind me of the Courier Mail so why do I bother to pay extra for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Howard ny thing looks good. Rudd has done many thing to right the Hoard wrongs so lay off and be constructive. You remind me of the Courier Mail so why do I bother to pay extra for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Loughman</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24650</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Loughman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24650</guid>
		<description>How many wonky &quot;stunts&quot; has Keane carried out in his 100 days in Canberra ?  None , I imagine, except write this kind of carping journallism !! Get off your bottom,  and see what&#039;s happening beyond your myopic vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many wonky &#8220;stunts&#8221; has Keane carried out in his 100 days in Canberra ?  None , I imagine, except write this kind of carping journallism !! Get off your bottom,  and see what&#8217;s happening beyond your myopic vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24651</guid>
		<description>&quot;I once was lulled by now I see&quot;  Rudd is an expert stuntsman and Gillard the perfect weapon to aim ... their combined nastiness might look good against &quot;evil&quot; conservatives but it won&#039;t be long b4 their smiles wear thin and their stunts get old </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>I once was lulled by now I see&#8221;  Rudd is an expert stuntsman and Gillard the perfect weapon to aim &#8230; their combined nastiness might look good against &#8220;evil&#8221; conservatives but it won&#8217;t be long b4 their smiles wear thin and their stunts get old</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noddy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24652</link>
		<dc:creator>noddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24652</guid>
		<description>Spot on. About time that someone saw through all the Rudd-stunts. Perhaps more journalists are the ones who should be &#039;rolling up their sleeves&#039;, &#039;burning the midnight oil&#039; and getting down to work . . . only after their &#039;iced vo-vos&#039;. Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. About time that someone saw through all the Rudd-stunts. Perhaps more journalists are the ones who should be &#8216;rolling up their sleeves&#8217;, &#8216;burning the midnight oil&#8217; and getting down to work &#8230; only after their &#8216;iced vo-vos&#8217;. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Weston</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/03/100-days-of-wonky-stunts/#comment-24653</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24653</guid>
		<description>So 70% of Australians have been fooled by stunts?    What a  gullible lot we are!  No wonder  Bernard Keane thinks he can fool us too.       </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So 70% of Australians have been fooled by stunts?    What a  gullible lot we are!  No wonder  Bernard Keane thinks he can fool us too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
